|
Government Agencies and
Related
Securities
- The Main Issuers
-
Background of the main GSE
-
Types of Securities
|
|
The Main Issuers
|
Agency |
Public /
Private |
Sector |
Explicit U.S. Government
Guarantee? |
|
Fannie Mae
|
Public |
Housing |
No |
|
Freddie Mac |
Public |
Housing |
No |
|
Federal Home Loan
bank |
Private |
Housing |
No |
|
Federal Farm
Credit System |
Private |
Farming |
No |
|
Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA) |
Private |
Utilities |
No |
|
Sallie Mae |
Public |
Education |
No |
|
Private Export
Funding Corp (PEFCO) |
Private |
Exports |
Yes |
|
U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) |
Private |
Foreign
Housing |
Yes |
|
Financial
Assistance Corp (FAC) |
Private |
Farming |
Yes |
|
General Services
Administration |
Private |
Housing |
Yes |
|
Small Business
Administration (SBA) |
Private |
Small
Business |
Yes |
Are these solid
credit quality investments? Yes,
without a doubt.
Are these investments
guaranteed by the government?
Some are; some are not. If the bonds are issued by a Federal Agency,
such as Ginnie Mae, then the debt is backed by the full faith and credit of
the U.S. Government. If, however, the bonds are issued by a Government
Sponsored Enterprise (GSE), such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, then they are
not guaranteed by the federal government.
Therein lies the issue:
there seems to be a dichotomy between what is written by the GSEs and what
is believed (inferred) by investors. Some of these GSEs are clearly telling
their bondholders that their debt is not guaranteed by the federal
government. Investors, however, are receiving and accepting thin spreads
(low rates) on the assumption that there is an implied guarantee that the
U.S. Government will make bondholders whole in the unlikely event of a
default. It seems that many investors are betting that, because of the
affiliation that these agencies have with the federal government, if
defaults occur, the federal government will bail them out
When the
creditworthiness of the GSE bonds is discussed, you often hear terms like
“very secure,” “the government would probably,” “almost risk free,” or
“essentially backed.” These are wiggle room terms that should automatically
raise red flags to alert investors. Prudence is essential. The
author operates under the assumption that unless there is a guarantee in
writing, there is none.
Some Food for Thought
- Over the years, the issue as to
whether or not the debt of these GSEs is guaranteed by the government has
been discussed at length. The documentation seems to be clear that the U.S.
Treasury will only back Agency debt that it explicitly guarantees.
Additionally, the budgeting department of the
U.S. government prepares national debt calculations, keeping the debt of
some of the Government Sponsored Enterprises out of the calculations. The
budget numbers don’t lie.
Let’s be very clear, if
a default ever occurs, our government has the money to make everyone whole.
We are the richest country in the world. The question is: Should the
taxpayers bail out real estate investors or any investors? You just don’t
know which way the votes will go.
Don’t misinterpret my
point! GSEs provide excellent
investment opportunities for income orientated investors. These corporations
have major advantages over their competitors. They have a “cheap” cost of
funds compared with similar public companies. Some, however, are leveraged,
and their operations would be hindered, if they were standalone
organizations. Nonetheless, inexpensive borrowing rates and high leverage
permit these agencies to maximize their profits and cash flows. They also
are exempt from certain state and local taxes.
Life is long, however,
and many different situations may present themselves. When lenders tell you
that certain debt obligations are not guaranteed, believe them! This way,
hopefully, you can plan and implement a proper diversification strategy, so
you won’t be overly exposed to any one asset class, in case of an unexpected
crisis.
|