|
Index of Companies Aegon
Americredit
AIG
Altera
Applebee's
Aqua America
Atmel
Avid
Biomet
Bombardier
Inc
Boston Scientific
Bristol Myers Sq.
Calpine
Career Education
Celera Genomics
Chiron
CIT
Colgate-Palmolive
Commerce Bank
Corinthian Colleges
CP Ships
Denny's
Discover FS
El Paso
Fannie Mae
Force Protection
Foster Wheeler
Freddie Mac
Fresenius
Genentech
General Electric
Genworth Financial
GlobalSantaFe
Google
Halliburton
Heart Rate Theory
H&R Block
Input/Output
Int. Game Tech
Irwin Financial
ITT Ed. Services
Jackson Hewitt
Lockheed Martin
LSI Logic
Lucent
Marsh & McLennan
Merck
Met Life
Nabors
Nortel
Nvida
Pearson
Pfizer
Popular
Prudential
Q Logic
QLTI
Raytheon
Renal Care Group
Repsol
Research in Motion
Rhodia
Royal Group
Sanyo
Scientific-Atlanta
Sea Containers
Service Corp.
Sirf
Spartan Motors
Sprint
Sumitomo
Taser
Tenet
Thermo Electron
Thornburg Mortgage
Titan
Unilever
Univision
USEC
Valero Energy
Veritas
Videsh Sanchar N.
Vimpel
World Acceptance
Xilinx Advertise
Your
Company's Products
Here! E-mail
us at:
JoeCC@optonline.net
Advertise Your
Company's Products
Here! E-mail
us at:
JoeCC@optonline
.net |
|

Hello, I’m Joe Spinella; I hope
you find the following thoughts insightful:
Because of my time constraints
I’m only updating my blog intermittingly. The content, however, is being
kept because of its historical significance. The Chestnut and Cedar Stock
Report was one of the few reputable resources that timed the market
correctly and predicted the 2008 stock market crash and accurately
identified which stocks to short.
This blog gives a real time investor perspective into one of the most
turbulent financial periods since the 1929 stock market collapse; moreover,
it’s a great case study for investors.
– Enjoy and profit by it. – Joe Spinella
1/19/09 I'm still mostly in cash, hoping the economy doesn't spiral downward
out of control. Some of the big name financials, however, look inexpensive
and may be worth dipping your toes in.
General Electric
(GE
- $13.00) or Bank
of America (BAC
- $7.00) seem attractive. GE is under 9 times projected 12/09 earnings while
BAC is selling at a fraction of book value, nonetheless, both companies
needed government subsidies - which is scary. GE's stock price is down 69%
from it's 2007 high of $42.2 and BAC is off 87% from it's 2007 high of
$54.2. Be very careful, both companies are highly leveraged and timing
is everything. Look, on 9/15/08 I thought AIG was an acceptable
speculative investment at $124.60 (adj.) and was dead wrong. I never imagined the
government nationalizing the company. The rules are still changing so be
conservative with your money.
10/21/08 The party continues as the Federal Reserve provides up to $540
billion to boost money market mutual funds and the commercial paper markets.
Many investment professionals, moreover, are talking that the bottom is now.
I, however, still see high stock prices, IBM for instance is at $90.--;
Lockheed Martin at $85.--; and Colgate-Palmolive is at $63.-- just to name a
few. These are not steels. I also don't see panic among the
newscasters, I just see, mostly, giddy kids. Dipping your toes into some of
the depressed high quality blue chips, selling at PE multiples under 10
maybe ok. But don't jump in; I understand another stimulus package is being
considered; so evidently all is not well.
10/13/08 The administration is throwing one hell of a party today. The world
is celebrating giving the banks $250 billion; the Dow is up 11% or 936
points. What ever happened to the concept of being fiscally responsible, and
leaving something to our kids other than debt. I just don't think pumping up
stock prices and pandering to Wall Street, is the way to go. Don't fool
yourself, stock prices should be down as the world economies are slowing
and unemployment raising.
10/8/08 Yes, I correctly predicted, on 8/31/07, the
current stock market crash; now, however, I'm a little scarred. Not because of
daily declining US stock prices or the 9.38% drop in the Nikkei last night
or even the reportedly $2 trillion drop in pension plan assets, but
because a small portion of my cash, held at TD Ameritrade, was frozen. I
wonder how many investors realize their cash balances may not be secure? This
is a scary and potentially explosive situation! Because cash (treasury funds) are now risky,
and the whole financial system is shaky; stock
prices, therefore, deserve to be lower and may continue to fall.
My forward strategy is simple; I'm looking for quality companies, with
inexpensive stock prices, where I could pick up a lot of shares. I'm not
interested in "Fair Value" I'm looking for deep discounted prices. The number of share matters
and is a critical factor for one's success, as it determines your upside potential in
future years. Do the math yourself, most companies have limited upside,
therefore, the number of shares determine your potential profit.
(As a reminder, quality companies are those that sell necessary products, to recurring customers, at
attractive profit margins; they should also have little debt, and healthy
cash flows.)
Don't forget to diversify and only invest with funds you don't need until
the next election cycle in four years. - Good Luck!
9/15/08
American International Group (AIG
-$124.60 - Adjusted for a 20 to 1 reverse split in 8/09) The stock is low because of bankruptcy concerns main due to the lack
of transparency with its numbers. Nonetheless I believe this is a great
company and it should be able to withstand, further mortgage related losses,
a credit downgrade and a low stock price. I just don't know if capital is
needed, but it has valuable assets that can be sold to raise cash. For those
with Atlantic City money this is a buy. - Good Luck!
7/13/08
United States
Enrichment Corporation (USU
- $ 4.57) Here is a company especially suited for the rare long-term
aggressive investor looking for an inexpensive energy play. The overall
investment theme is centered on continued high energy prices, combined with
global warming concerns, that will cause the US (and the rest of the world)
to slowly revitalize its nuclear industry. USU provides the fuel to our
nuclear reactors. As of 12/07, it is a $1.9 billion company with a net
income of $97 million and a market capitalization of $500 million. USU is
building a new, cost efficient, enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio. The plant
should be operating, in a test mode, by 2009, reaching its initial targeted
capacity by late 2012. Construction financing along with choppy earnings are
a concern that has
caused its share price to drop from
$25 to $4 this year.
Leaping forward to URENCO, Europe’s version of USU. URENCO has a 23%
global market share with plants in UK, Germany, and the Netherlands, plus
subsidiaries in France & New Mexico.
URENCO has a net profit margins of 23%.
By applying URENCO’s margins to
USU, then factor in some growth and increased cost of funds on $3.5 billion
to build the new plant; you get a very profitable government-granted
monopoly. USU is a complicated company, start reading up on its contracts with Russia
& its loan funding concerns. It takes
a while to acquire a taste for USU, moreover, the real payout will be over a
decade away.
1/20/08 Ok, the world markets have started to decline. Now, we are in an
envyable position, having predicted this situation four months ago. How do
we play it? Look for the companies you know, that have dropped substantial,
have recurring customers, and have the financial wherewithal to survive.
Companies like
Sprint Nextel (S
- $8.49). It has 53 million customers and is down from its 2007 high of
$23 (a classic Fibonacci retracement). The goal is to pick up a lot of
shares at low prices. This could get bad, and could drag out for years. We
want only quality companies, that hiccupped, and whose shares have
substantially dropped.
9/14/07 I happen to notice that
GE (GE
- $40.41) is over $40 per share. There is no question that GE is a
reasonably priced, great company, with excellent prospects. Nevertheless,
its a big user of commercial paper and asset-backed securities. Why
pay top dollar when every few days there's another casualty in the financial
markets? Wait until clarity returns to the debt markets. On a side note, I
personally do not see why anyone would want to buy any of the $350billion of
junk bonds that the banks are pushing; there could be a ripple effect
through-out the markets if the upcoming M&A deals are not funded. Be
careful.
9/9/07 It's no secret the specialty finance companies are structurally and
financially hurting. While their stock prices are significantly off their
highs, prices may drop further. There are a few jewels, however, that remain
among the carnage. These firms are solid, well
managed institutions, with good prospects. They deserve to be on a (buy)
watch list. For now I'm lining up potential steals; I'm looking for a 60%+ drop from
their current values. Below are a list of the players to watch:
(Remember you are looking for steals.)
P.S. The above firms should consider merging, combined they would make one hell
of a company!
10/1/07 Sorry for being out of date order. I'm tracking a few more finance
companies and just wanted to keep the list in one place, in case there's a
melt down.
9/7/07 Evidently the SEC is probing into the big credit rating firms,
"looking for conflicts of interest, both in how they are paid and in their
standards for ratings." No comments for now, just keep up to date on
the topic. I would, however, hold off on investing in these firms until
clarity returns.
Click here
for an overview of the rating agencies.
9/5/07 I have received a lot of feedback from my 8/31/07 comments, I realize
my position is a little radical. The markets, however, are ignoring the
implications of "risks being re-priced"; yesterday stock prices
actually increased, with The Dow up 90 points. When risks increase, assets
are "re-priced" downward. In other words, the accounting balance sheet
values become overstated and will eventually be written down. Companies will
report losses and book values will be reduced. It seems the market is
looking past these future losses. My bet is that investors will connect the
dots and adjust stock prices very quickly. Thus I like ST treasury funds for
the near term. - Good Luck, Joe
I think over the next few months a stock market crash is
imminent.
8/31/07 The writings by
John Crudele
regarding The President's Working Group on Financial Markets ("Plunge
Protection Team") are disconcerting. If true, I hope it's legal and the
players know what they are doing. Moreover, we are in the middle of a
perfect storm. High oil and commodity prices, large deficits, a cash
draining war, a weak dollar, a liquidity freeze, a housing crisis, topped by
high stock prices.
Credit
ratings, on debt instruments, are a major worldwide concern. Yes, the economy is strong, It was also strong in
1929. US Treasuries, and
FDIC insured
accounts, may be the best way to protect your capital. There
are few bargains. Playing
the momentum game at the very top of the market, by buying on dips and hoping
government announcements will prop up the market, will last only so long. Investing
at top stock market prices, while
our banking system is in crisis and a recession looming is ignoring the
basic risk/reward rules. The
liquidity freeze is real and serious, more
important, however, the fire walls that were put in place in the depression
have been torn down and are no longer their to protect the banking system.
The lessons learned by the 1929 crash have been forgotten.
Now is the time to read up on the
Presidential Election Year Cycle Theory and remember Cash is King.
For now, I'm taking my basketball and going home. I think a crash is imminent. Good Luck - Joe
7/11/07 Subprime mortgages are scaring investors. It's more than the
projected losses, however, there is a growing loss of confidence in the
certified balance sheet values reported by financial institution. The
held-to-maturity accounting rules may have been followed, nevertheless,
these securities are reselling at a lower price than reported. The objective
principal and transparency rules somehow got lost, rendering financial
statements useless. Therefore, owning stocks of financial institution should
be avoided until this issue is sorted out.
6/4/07
Force Protection
(FRPT
- $24.11) and
Spartan Motors (SPAR
- $22.71) are small armored vehicle manufactures that may be of interest to
momentum investors. Force is more of a pure play, while, Spartan is more
diversified. Zacks is estimating 2007 EPS at $0.77 and $1.27, respectively.
As contract awards are announced, share prices may be volatile. On an
unrelated topic; I'm still very concerned with the Chinese's markets.
Be careful.
6/2/07 Regarding the concept of "trusting management" or a particular high
profile CEO. I realize certain CEO's are better than others, nonetheless,
when dealing with stocks, it's not about trust, it's about money. Investing
is serious, and its not a game. Money is made when hard earned cash, comes
out of someone's pocket and into someone else's pocket. Look, most investors
don't know, and will never know, the managers who are running their
investments. Do you really know, for example "guys" like Steve Jobs, Michael
Dell or Eddie Lampert? Most people don't. When investing learn to leave
trust at the door, in its place, Learn to Question Everything and Think
Critically.
6/1/07 Ok, the Chinese market did not collapse over night. Nevertheless,
liquating your crappy investments and hold them in cash (treasuries money
market funds) was a good move. GDP at .6% in the first quarter, could turn
negative by September, and we could be in a recession by October 1st.
Housing is bad, prices are somewhat keeping up, but there are few, if any,
buyers. High oil prices combined with the cost of the war makes for an
environment that is not conducive to stocks. Red flags are up and there is
not a clear path for profits. I realize jobs are plentiful and everyone is
feeling good. This is the time to pay off your debts and be very selective
with your investments.
5/30/07 Ok, Shanghai is down 6.5%. The market is up and the Feds are not
concerned. Nonetheless, I'm worried, lets run for the hills. All speculative
and aggressive money should be in cash tonight. You don't want to wake up to
any unforeseen surprises from China. Not when trading cost are inexpensive.
5/25/07 I was there 34 years ago, when the oil service stocks rose everyday
for the longest time. They sold at a premium to the market. Today the big
three are growing 18% -20% per year, have PE ratios less than their growth
rates, and are selling at a discount to the market. Here's where the value
is:
However, forget all the analysis, eventually human nature takes over, every
time you fill up your gas tank, the thought comes up: I must get into oil
stocks!
5/24/07 Sirf
(SIRF
- 21.84) I always liked this little GPS company, nevertheless, don't fight
the tape. At $21 the price looks inexpensive, but the stock is weak and a
market correction, could cut the price in half. Trading in the (low price)
energy names, like
Input/Output (IO
- $15) may make more sense. - Good Luck.
5/9/07 So Warren Buffett is buying, nonetheless, I'm still bearish. The
economy is slowing, housing is still declining. Energy prices are high.
Consumers are feeling the pinch. Moreover, the banks have allowed the
subprime lending philosophy to expend into business lending. M&A is out of
control. The world markets are in overdrive.
In the U.S. there is a divergence between trends in stock prices and the
direction of the economy. Now, how do we play this? Get out of the emerging
markets, their prices are just to high. Have some sort of cash position.
Stay with the defensive names. Look for companies with recurring customers
and products that don't need to be reinvented regularly. (I like Apple, but
not, in this market and at these prices.) Company Financials should show
solid cash flows with little debt. Look for "best of breed" with low P/E
ratios. I like
Halliburton (Hal - $32) and
Medtronic
(MDT - $53). Everyone is trading, so be careful. Focus on companies, that if
a negative situation occurs, they could be held, for a long, long time, with
the hope that time can cure your losses.
4/23/07 While I'm still bearish, some
of the value stocks that are being pushed like Halliburton or Medtronic do
look attractive. I realize the world markets are up, nevertheless, the
economy is slowing, housing continues to decline, and oil prices are
controlling the stock market. I noticed that Citigroup is laying off 17,000
employees. I hope this is a one off situation. It's time to be careful. Take some of your
profits and pay down the mortgage and payoff the credit cards. Try not
to lose any money.
4/9/07 I believe the "Veteran Financiers" are spending their money to early.
Their timing is wrong. Maybe that's to harsh of a word. It's just not the
time to buy WCI or Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. You may be able to
pick these (or similar companies) up cheaper, if you wait. When you're worth
billions, the game is different. You could buy on the low side and wait
until the market turns and do very well. As long as your purchases are on
the low side you should do ok; furthermore, you could be a hero to the
press and big money managers. For the stock picker, worth between zero and a
few million dollars, however, the game is different, buying low is ok
(mediocre) but "dirt cheap" is the goal. This market, moreover, has been up for a year,
dirt cheap is hard to come by. Be care and don't
follow the leaders. Look and wait for steals.
4/5/07 The market looks strong. It has been up for the past few days.
Political tensions appeared to have eased. Oil, defense, technology and
medical are up. As for me, I'm taking profits.
Hope everyone has a nice holiday. - Joe
P.S. The interesting thing is that I like "King Hal" yet I just sold it .
(Sanyo is different, it's not a trading stock, its a long-term turnaround
situation - Hold on to it. "The jury is still out.")
3/13/07 Wait, don't jump, try to get a steal.
3/5/07 Investors around the world have the right to be jittery. Prices are
overvalued. There are very few "steels" out there. I'm still very bearish
and believe treasuries are the place to be. Save haven stocks are not the
way to go. Why risk it if the upside is limited at best. For those who are
pushing the technology sector, go back and see for yourself what happened
to the Nifty Fifty tech stars 35 years ago. They got killed when the market
dropped, some never came back. Technology does not hold up in a slow down.
Newscasters, nonetheless, are doing a good job in pushing prices up and
keeping individuals buying. Who, however, is doing the selling? By the
way, if you believe the 5 best executives in the world are running the NYC
investment banking houses you deserve to lose money.
2/27/07 Today the market dropped 415 points. The newscaster are really
optimistic, and are using all the key words: "Buy on the dips;
corrections are just part of the game; this is just a small blip;
there were much bigger drops in the past and the market always bounced back;
in ten years the market is going to be way up". It all sounds good if it's
not your money. This could be serious. Remember we took big hits in 2000 and
much of it was not made back. Stock prices for many of the big companies
have been flat for seven years. Housing values are still high, they have
dropped, and buyers are few and far between, but most home owners are still
ahead. If real estate, however, drops further the consumer may take another
hit. With a recession anticipated by year-end, and the war being financed by
debt there is a real concern. Consumers may not be able to afford a third or
fourth hit. The young adults, out of school a few years, are doing
fine; however, they really have little at risk. It's the 45 to 75 year old
group that has the most to lose. The flight to quality (the big blue chips)
may not be the best approach to protect your capital. With short-term upside
limited, why take the risk. In a declining market everything drops. For $10
go straight to treasuries, until the market is sorted out.
2/27/07 Remember "Cash is King". The China situation is scary (their market
crashed). If they have another bad day tomorrow, the world equity markets
have a problem. World leadership is needed, and yet talking is limited.
Someone has to step-up and provided, just in case, liquidity to China. Calls
need to be made to all the big pension and investment funds, worldwide,
asking them not to flinch. I wonder who's doing all of this? Especially,
since the fed chairman is meeting with congress tomorrow. With the equity
market relatively high, the $10 trading fee is worth protecting your assets.
The potential short-term upside is not worth the risk. There is no longer a
clear path to profit if China is unstable. Preservation of capital is a very
prudent strategy.
2/23/07
Sanyo The risk were high and now it's notched up a level. Nonetheless,
here we are. It goes without saying that more information is needed and it's going to take a
while for investigations to be completed and made public. This cloud will
depress the shares until more information is released. So far, it doesn't sound
that bad; while shifting historical expenses from period to period is not good.
Japan has been notorious for using hidden reserves. If the issue is all related to prior years and has little effect on future
cash flows the company's stock price may bounce back somewhat quickly. I'm
not sure if its a fraud or an attempt to dislodge management. At these
prices do we sell or buy more? These types of situations can present
opportunities, nonetheless, I would
take a wait and see attitude. It's day-to-day until we can get a handle on
all the issues and see where the price settles.
2/15/07
Baker Hughes (BHI
- $65.75) They just had a horrible conference call. A bad conference call,
weak oil prices, a warn northeast winter, and little 2007 guidance, sounds
like a buying opportunity. They are entering their seasonal slow period;
nonetheless, they are a solid world class oil service organization that may
benefit longer term energy investors. Yes, their presentation was awful,
however, they know the energy business and how to run a company. This is
where the value is today. Regarding disclosures, I have an
indirect ownership interest in BHI.
1/26/07 I'm still bearish. I do, however, like
Sanyo. They seem to be moving forward on introducing
new products. I realize everyone wants to buy Apple; and "Sanyo is the poor
cousin to Sony," nonetheless, Sanyo is transitioning from a turnaround play
into a value play.
(i.e. value stocks earn money; turnaround stocks may not.).
1/10/07 The Wall Street Journal is still one of the best places to get
investment ideas. Today, section B1 has a article on how GE is transitioning
its business out of plastics and into the following areas:
GE employs some of the most, dedicated,
talented and brightest minds in the world. (this is not paid advertisement)
The point is, when they show a portion of their hand, you should at least
take notice. Because of there size, they may not be a suitable investment
for everyone, nonetheless, they may be showing you a clear path to long-term
profits if you follow some of their investment themes.
1/7/07 I realize I haven't posted in a month. Sorry. I have, however, been
pushing ahead to improve the site. I'm going to improve the flow and content
of the educational sections. The revisions read very well, and look
excellent. It's going to take a few months before it's all completed and the
new content gets published. My e-book contest expired. The publisher
informed my that not one person purchased my latest e-book and entered the
contest. Yes, not one person! I even advertised on "My Space" and had a real
goofy cartoon. Well lets move on. Now for stocks:
The Sanyo theme still looks good. Remember, the stock is down from $50 per
share, a few years ago, to $6.- today. The ADR volume is very light.
If the turnaround works, it's going to be very easy to promote the company
and push the price up to a more reasonable level. My biggest concern is that
the stock price stays flat for years (like what happened to Lucent). I don't
think that will happen, because Goldman Sacks is a big investor. I'm still,
however, bearish on the overall market. Prices just seem to high. Over
Christmas, I spent time thinking as to why I'm so bearish. My inner being,
tells me you just can't run a major war effort without raises taxes. I
realize some very smart people are saying we could. Nonetheless the
accountant in me thinks it could only end badly for our financial markets.
Sanyo may also protect us from a weak dollar. Energy stocks came down
last week. Stocks like
Baker Hughes
(BHI
- $67) and
Anadarko Petroleum (APC
- 41) are looking up. I still, however, would hold off and wait for a
steel.
12/01/06 Sanyo Electric Co. (SANYY
- $6.95) This is a very interesting, but risky, turnaround situation.
Sanyo does approximately $19.7 billion in business and expects to lose about
$430 million this year (ending 3/07). They manufacture, among many things,
rechargeable batteries, solar panels & cells, heating and air conditioning systems, and personal
mobile devices (cell phones, GPS, and video cameras). The majority of their business is done in Japan and Asia;
about 14% is done in North America. In January (06) they strengthen their
capital structure by issuing $2.6 billion in preferred stock; they are,
however, still very leveraged. I read their footnote #20, but I still don't
fully understand exactly how many diluted shares they have outstanding. I
believe they have, excluding their preferred shares, approximately 371
million (evaluate) ADR's outstanding. Recently, they failed to meet some of
their turnaround financial targets, (but they are still making excellent
progress), and their stock dropped. Sanyo is
comprised of approximately 200 to 300 companies. They are restructuring and
streamlining their operations with a special focus on turning around (or
exiting) their semiconductor,
TV, home appliance and credit businesses. If their turnaround is
executed somewhat correctly, I believe, this can be an excellent investment. In
the short-term, however, the share price may be weak.
(P.S. I have not yet nail down their potential cash flow, so I won't quote
figures, but they maybe able to produce big numbers.)
11/27/06 Stay put, if, you are holding cash. Yes, the market is down 158
points today, still there are few bargains. As the economy slows, PE ratios
may contract, and "steals" may present themselves. The healthcare stocks
like UnitedHealth
Group (UNH
- $46.18) are starting to look attractive, however, I don't see a clear path
to real profits. I would wait until Congress show us where they are heading
before diving in.
11/17/07 The best buy all year is available today. Go to the Seiko (Home
Office) sale in Mahwah, N.J. They really support the community by offering
excellent watches at very very reasonable prices (I believe today's the last
day of the sale). Thank you Seiko!
11/16/06 (KBR
- $21.93) Nothing-for-nothing, but, I recall Dresser buying Kellogg, for
approximately $100 million "yearrrsss" ago. Yes, it's only a portion of the current KBR,
nonetheless, at these prices, I don't see a steel. (P.S. I think the country
owes KBR, big time, nonetheless, when the powers to be openly state they are
going to watch them very closely, it's not a good situation; as a result,
one needs to be careful.)
11/14/06 7:30pm. The TV stock shows are out of control. One "guy" gets
on TV and said "bring on the next tech. bubble. He doesn't see enough stocks
that he can short. He feels that IPO's that make management wealth then
crash and burn is what America needs to be competitive." These "guys"
are out of control and don't care that they are playing with pension fund
money. It's legalized steeling. When I was in college 28 years ago, I
supported the repeal of Glass Steagall. I now feel it was a mistake. What
ever happened to the concept that bankers have a fiduciary duty to protect
depositors' money. Loan shark lending practices, out of control IPO's, and
private equity & hedged funds gone wild is not a good situation. Again today
stocks are up.
11/12/06 Again the NYSE is up! 208 new 52-week highs and only 15 new 52-week
lows. The news writers are now suggesting that sitting on cash is a foolish,
loser's, strategy; reflecting investor's lack of confidence and
understanding of equities. Arrogance with other peoples money usually
ends badly. Remember money is hard to come by, be careful. Wall Street
Bonuses are just around the corner, someone has to pay for them. Hopefully
it's not our readers. The real estate market is in a free fall. Just
the other day I read an article that mentioned that up to 200,000 real
estate brokers could lose their jobs! The developers are now reducing their
exposure to land. This is not a good situation. If housing continues to
decline, there is a big possibility, the downward pressure on real estate
values, will roll over to the stock market. It could happen so quickly that
most investors will be unable to react fast enough to protect their
portfolios. Prudence is in order! Preservation of capital is an excellent
strategy in a slowing economy.
11/9/06 Congratulations, and Best of Luck, to the Democrats. Regarding
investing, the stock market game became a
little harder yesterday. My wait and see strategy, however, remains the
same. Lots of ideas, such as; Do you short healthcare and defense? Long
Toyota (TM
- $122.37) and
Devon (DVN
- $71.08)? Buy
Pacific Ethanol (PEIX
- $17.76) or
Altair (ALTI-
3.11)? Stem Cells? No answers yet. I don't feel a need to rush
in, given the market is at a high. Money
market rates are still high. I would wait until we see what happens, before
investing.
11/3/06 "Price-To-Perfection" leaves no room for disappointments.
Garmin (GRMN
- $46.50) and
Whole Foods (WFMI
- $47.50) are good examples of the risks of momentum investing. These
are great companies who's stock prices got ahead of themselves, then sharply
corrected. Yeah, most
likely you can pick up some coffee money by playing the next day bounce,
however, long-term the game changed. These organizations are still trading
with PE ratios far in excess of their growth rates. As growth slows it takes
time for valuations to get back into sync. That leads to the question: How
long will a valuation correction take? It hard to say, look at
Medtronic (MDT-
$48.96) It's taking them 7 to 10 years and they executed perfectly. The same
with GE. The point is no one knows, so be careful. Remember, protect your
capital, don't let your intellect and pride get in the way. If you are
involved in similar situations and your investment is down substantially,
sell quickly to give yourself time to
reassess your position while protecting your equity. There will always another good
investment on the horizon to help recapture any losses. Pricing securities
to perfection has a big downside!
10/31/06 The article in today's Journal regarding increasing bankruptcies
and debt settlements in the UK caught my attention. As the world economies
slow cracks are opening up. The banks are going to be hurt. Willy Nilly
lending practices never end good. I was reading an article the other day on
how bond investors of sub-prime debt felt, with the help of derivatives,
they would be protected from credit losses. Ok. Good luck to them. Flatting
growth and increasing stock prices is what I would call a disconnect.
10/26/06 I'm tired of being wrong for so long. The world seems happy.
Earnings are up. No one cares growth is slowing. Stocks are up, even
companies with bad earning reports are going up. There is no rhyme or
reason. China's ICBC's IPO is a big hit. I just don't understand why
investors are paying top dollar to buy a bank with lots of bad loans and
weak internal controls. So much for the buy low, sell high theory. Life is
good and investors have forgotten that money is hard come by. New home
prices are down 10%. To me that's a lot of money, everyone else, however,
feels that we are in for a "soft" landing. When the financial markets
dropped in 2000 excess wealth was lost. Real Estate, however, is the core
wealth of most Americans, another drop in price and middle Americas are
going to feel it. We are at war and yet tax rates are low. It doesn't work
that way. It's going to really hit home if the dollar drops and foreigners
come in and buy our assets on the cheap. I would take your profits and pay
down your debts. Secure your house, pay the mortgage off while the financial
markets are high.
10/19/06 Aqua
America (WTR
- $23.61) I feel as if I'm the last Bear standing as I watch the Dow hitting
new highs regularly. I missed an excellent three month run; nonetheless, I continue to believe
it's better to wait than to jump in on the bull market. I'm not as
optimistic on the economy as the TV business newscasters, and my heart tells me
the bull market could be the result of an election year spin. Many of the journalist are giddy and sound
as if they are the experts. The English and
Communication majors are now controlling stock prices. The problem is,
many never had a real job in business and are ignoring the No Swimming
Signs. The cyclical companies are slowing and that is bad. It's hard to stop
a slow down. Be careful! Money is hard to come by. On a more positive
note, the October 16, 2006 Barron's article on water stocks was excellent. I
also feel the long term trends are very favorable for the industry. The
infrastructure companies are being recommended. In this market, I like the
recurring aspect of the business. I suggest, investors look at Aqua
America's Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan. WTR's P/E
ratio and market capitalization are high, nonetheless, it's DRIP is a nice
way to get your feet wet without jumping in.
10/6/06 As the Dow was hitting highs yesterday, the stock newscasters all
sounded like experts. Many viewers forget that the newscasters are actors
nothing more nothing less. I highly recommend not getting caught up in their
hype. When the markets are up, as they are now, take some of
your profits and pay down your bank debt.
To make good money you need to buy low, even the low stocks, however, may be
to expensive.
Halliburton (Hal
- $27.67), Sprint
(S
- 17.86), and
Boston Scientific (BSX
- $14.92) are all near their lows. These are Best-of-Breed organizations
that over time should make excellent investments. I, however, would still
wait; at their current prices they are not steals. Look for the steal.
Anyone can buy a Best-of-Breed Company. Good investments at fair prices are
easy to come by. The trick is to get a steal.
9/28/06 And so it begins! As the market is hitting recent highs, friends
are saying we are just in the beginning stages of a bull market. Justifying
their views, on the theory, that as home prices moderate, investors will be redeploying
their money into the stock market, pushing stock prices up. As for me, my
neighborhood is seeing home values drop at least 15% in price from a year
ago; additionally, regardless of price, there are very few buyers. Local
statistics are showing flat or slightly down home prices. The statistics are
just wrong! If the trends continue there could be a real issue; my friends,
however, may have a point. Business growth is also slowing. Everyone is hoping for a soft
landing, nonetheless, slower growth historically translates into lower PE
ratios, thus low stock prices. With this as a backdrop. Page B1 of
yesterdays WSJ mentioned that the Department of Labor statistics estimated
that in 2005, 401k plans had a net withdrawal of $5 billion and the numbers
are expected to increase to $39 billion in 2010 as the baby boomers retire.
The young generation is not naive, I don't believe they are going to bail
out the baby boomers without getting their "pound of flesh".
And so the withdrawals begin!
9/22/06 Boston
Scientific (BSX
- $14.73) Wait! Don't Rush! Don't be fooled, however, this is an excellent company
that just stumbled. Yes, it has
product and leverage issues, nonetheless, at the end of the day this is a
money making blue chip medical device company. The stock price will
eventually go up, however, the trick is to buy low. We are looking for a
steal, a few points can make the difference between a very good investment
and a mediocre one. I would take the position, that it is better to miss an
opportunity than to overpay.
9/19/06 I believe in the general premise of the election year cycle theory.
That the political powers do their best to make the economy run the
smoothest at election time. I think the concept also applies to mid-term
elections. There's a great deal of uncertainty, and risk, after November.
Additionally, I'm not sold on the theory that as home prices decline,
investors will move their money out of real estate and into the stock
market; creating the next stock market boom cycle. Today, I don't see many
steals, and I don't think buying fair value stocks is the way to go. Stock
prices are high! You just don't make real money paying "fair" value. Look at
my last suggestion, Sea Containers, It's a real crapshoot. You don't make
money on companies like that. Stay away from it. So what's the play? Their
is none; for now. So keep your money in cash. Preservation of capital
is a very good strategy.
9/8/06 Sea
Containers (SCRA
- $1.77) This is a pure "Atlantic City Play". At present it's
gambling not investing. Forget
the numbers! The critical issue is: Can all the players come to an agreement
and restructure the debt? I think there's enough money here to make
everyone whole, if the players are committed and not greedy. The down side, is that, if the
company goes into bankruptcy, asset values can dissipate quickly; wiping out
the stock value, as well as, causing the borrowers to take a haircut. I'm
optimistic, but things look bleak. Revised 9/10/06
9/1/06 With the summer coming to a close, yesterday the NYSE posted 184 new
52-week high stock prices with only 8 new lows. Prices bounced back nicely
from May. I would thank your broker, take your profits, pay down some debt,
treat yourself to a nice cup of coffee, and leave the rest in cash. Mid-term
elections are around the corner, and the next presidential election is in
2008. Real opportunities will present themselves, but you need to have cash
to take advantage of them. Now is the time to re-familiarize yourself with
the
Presidential Election Year Cycle Theory.
8/22/06 I feel as if I'm the last man standing; still believing Cash is King
in this environment. Everyday, however, stocks are going up, a lot of the
money that was on the sidelines in May has been redeployed. Investors seem
to be doing well. I see, however, unaffordable home prices that may not be
sustainable. Oil is pushing all prices up. Inflation is already here, just
go grocery shopping, you are getting less for your money. 7-11 coffee is
tasting better. The war is a huge cash drain. I just don't see how we could
pay for the war effort without increasing taxes. All the cash on corporate
balance sheets imply that CEO's feel better investment opportunities may
present themselves in the future, and having cash can be useful. A slowing
economy usually means lower stock prices. When growth slows, price earning
ratios narrow and per share stock prices decline or stay flat. It's that
simple!
8/06/06 El Paso
Corp. (EP
- $15.89) I believe the past performance of a stock doesn't predict its
future performance, it does however, show the pedigree of a security. I was
there 34 years ago, when the gas lines were long and gas stations owners
would serve their friends at mid-night. The oil service stocks were going up
every day. Then there was El Paso with its 13 brand new liquidfied natural
gas ships. We didn't lose money, but we didn't make any either. I was also
there in 2002 and purchased some shares at $5.00 and change, but, today,
there are better opportunities elsewhere in the gas field. Look, this
company has approximately $18B in debt. Who really cares how much it makes
tomorrow? Zacks shows EPS estimates at $1.03 for FYE 12/06 and $1.36
for 12/07. Any profits will first go to payback the lenders. Equity holders
won't see that cash for a long long time. As a side note, I realize that
money that was on the bench is being put back into play; I continue to
believe, however, its more prudent to keep one's money in cash to see how
the economy plays out over the next few months. Sorry, I don't see to many
values out there.
7/26/06 SIRF
(SIRF-$20.69)
This is one of my trading positions. That said, the stock is down
approximately 20% in pre market activity. Yes, sequential quarter-to-quarter
growth is slowing; however, I still see a company with excellent growth,
good margins, little debt, adequate cash, a great market position and a nice
pipeline of products. While I'm still bearish and feel cash is, temporarily,
the place to be, this little GPS company is very appealing.
7/17/06 The US economy is showing signs of Harding of the Arteries.
Corporate earnings are starting to slow. Inflation is here; wages and prices
are increasing. Housing prices are dropping and the war in the middle east
is escalating. The stock market, however, is hanging tough. Prices are very
high. Forget the Dow Jones Index. Forget PE Ratios. Just remember back a few
years when companies like Bayer sold for $10.00 per share. Corning for 50
cents. Yes, the patient is very sick, but the surgeons are still going on
their yearly vacations in August. Code Blue alarms are no where near going
off. The time to buy is when the Code Blue alarm sounds and the
defibrillators come out! Today is not that day! Now is the time, however, to start developing your
Christmas wish list of stocks you would like to own if prices go down.
7/11/06 The slow death is the worst possible investment scenario. Now your
down a little. Do you sell and take a loss or do you hold on and hope the
market rebounds. Do you follow the crowd into defensive positions? Good
companies like
EMC (EMC
- $10.48) are slowing down and their stock prices are nearing their yearly
lows. I realize the consumer staples, defense and energy sectors are holding
up; however, if the market drops both the good and bad companies will
decline. You could have a very slow deterioration of prices and wake up one
day being down "big bucks". I think it's time to take our basketballs
and leave the playground for another day, before we get hurt.
7/6/06 I noticed
Kraft Foods (KFT-
$30.90) was downgraded by the same firm that was pushing
Aether a few
year ago. I still believe "Cash is King" for the next few months, however,
Kraft is the type of company that if you buy on dips you should do well.
Most likely, "Philip
Morris" will eventually spin-off KFT and its shares should trade at
a higher premium; and you are being paid 3% while your waiting.
7/3/06 At my sister's family barbeque yesterday I realized, for the first
time, that the internet bubble had far lasting effects on investors'
attitudes. There were two camps: 1) there was the buy and hold side, those
investors who, on average, shied away from the 1990's technology
stocks and navigated the markets relatively unscathed. 2) There was my side;
those investors who were up to their neck in technology as the market burst
and got somewhat burned. Six years later, the buy and hold investors are
still holding, while the other camp acts more and more like swing traders.
They are very skeptical and they take their profits off the table very
quickly. The internet bubble changed investors' attitudes forever! Investors
are now quick to sell, and that is one of the reasons why more and more
investors are holding cash positions. If the path to profits is not clear,
or perceived as to risky, investors are opting out of the game. They are taking their
basketballs and going home. The buy and hold investors, however, are thinking that
these undisciplined hybrid
investors (who are sitting on cash) will be back, and when they do start
investing again their stocks will go up. I feel that the buy and hold
investor, forgot the golden rule of investing, which is: Cash Is King!
6/30/06 Life is good, stocks are up and the "Fed has calm words about
inflation." There is one small little issue. When I filled up on gas today
my bill was $42.00. The most I paid in a while. I wonder if the "boys"
at the Fed go grocery shopping? Bread is expensive. Fruits and
vegetables are also kind of high. They must have focused, their
analysis, on the cost of beef and chicken! Maybe the inflation data
they are looking at is the projected price of chicken. In the Fall, when the
birds migrate over the United States I bet the price of chicken drops,
thus relieving some inflation concerns. The handling of avian flu infected chicken may
kill you, nonetheless, if you properly cook it, eating it may be fine. Maybe
inflation really is under control. Joking around aside,
the newscasters are assuming interest rate increases have paused. I did not
here that from the Fed, and we all know what can happen when we ass/u/me.
6/27/06 Commodities and foreign stocks aside, at a quick glance it looks
like the market has
held up nicely over the past few months. Moreover, with some minor tweaking
into some of the consumer staple stocks your portfolio could have increased.
Kellogg (K
- $47.87),
Campbell (CPB
- $36.89) and
Heinz (HNZ
- $40.20) have preformed beautifully. Here's why, however, I've been pushing
cash. Major companies such as:
Medtronic (MDT
- $47.19),
IBM (IBM
- $76.77), AIG
(AIG
- $58.76) and others have been creeping down. These are Blue Chip Stocks
that are down 15% to 20% from January. Forget the buy and hold "crap" or
"I'm in it for the Long Haul". We are not kids anymore! 15% to 20% is a serious
decline. Money is hard to come by, don't fall in love with the idea of
owning a BIG portfolio. Sure a selective few stocks did well, but many more
declined. Remember, the goal is to make money.
6/23/06 Another status quo week. I do, however, have
two views on the
market. First, I'm in Borders reading the Baron's round table stock picks.
As I left the café I was thinking "there's no big money in these picks",
maybe Foster Wheeler
(FWLT
- $40.50). However, It
seems like the wall street crowd is "pushing" FWLT, so I'm a little leery.
(Zack's is showing 2006 EPS estimates at $1.57 and 2007 EPS estimates at
$2.40.) Second, on Tuesday, I noticed an article in Reuters that
mentioned that
wealthier investors are leaving more money in cash. It's starting to feel
like the early 1970's all over again. I think cash is a good place to keep
your money until visibility improves.
6/15/06 Today the markets are up nicely. It's normally a good time to take
money off the table, by selling into an uptick. The current thinking is that
we will probably see at least two more fed interest increases. I think it's
way to premature to buy into this rally. The safe haven stocks have not yet
seriously declined. As for the emerging markets (India, Chine, Mexico,
Russia, Brazil, and Japan), sure they took a big haircut since May 9th,
however, I still see inflated prices. I would wait until the economy slows
down and earning estimates start to be revised downward.
6/13/06 Well nothings new today! Stocks continue to decline on interest rate
concerns. Increases in housing prices have stalled, and maybe declined
somewhat. The emerging markets are in a state of flux, and commodity stocks
are in a free fall. Given all this as a backdrop, individual stocks have
held up nicely. Now the question is: How do we play the hand that is dealt
us? I believe, except for special situations, it's time to sit out
until market visibility improves.
6/9/06 When the federal reserve says they are going to increase interest
rates to fight inflation BELIEVE THEM. Increasing interest rates
historically slows the economy, thus slows the growth of corporate
profits, which lowers the market value of corporations, resulting in lower
stock prices. This trend is now global and the worldwide markets are
nervous. I'm not sure you could fight this trend by moving your assets into
defensive stocks; such as the consumer staples or the oil companies. If
prices continue to drop its going to effect everyone, usually, the
financially strong "best of breed" companies comeback. Your highly leverage
companies, however, may have issues. When rates increase bond prices
decrease; therefore, bonds are also not a safe place in an increasing
interest rate environment. If this worldwide decline in asset values
accelerates, start to familiarize yourselves with FDIC insured accounts and
US Treasuries Securities. I think stock prices are high and investors need
to be careful.
6/8/06 The analysts on CNBC are mentioning that the market may be bottoming
out. I hope they are right. In the meantime, I'm primarily in cash. The
prices of individual companies still look very high. I'm finding myself in
the bear camp. The funny thing about it, is that, I'm an optimistic person
by nature.
6/6/06 Today's Record has a good article on "Don't try to time the buying
and selling of stocks". I guess the "professionals" would like you to think
that the small investor (you) can not time the markets, but of course, they
could. I believe, however, that you need to try to time your trades. Today's
investors are educated, smart, and most have over twelve years of schooling. In the "old"
days commission costs prohibited trading, now trading costs are no longer an
issue. Firms, such as, TD Ameritrade charges only $9.95 per trade. Yes, the
majority of investors, most likely, are unable
to accurately time the markets. However, if your stocks are up in value, you could
take money off the table and wait for a better opportunity. If the markets
are high, and your securities are high, sell a little and cash out. It is better to
miss out on an opportunity then to experience a large decline. Try not to
give back your gains, if you have them, take your cash and be happy. If you
feel the markets are going to decline its ok to hold some cash. The thinking
that good companies always come back, is not necessarily true. Most investors
don't remember companies like Burroughs, do you know GE is the only
remaining original Dow Jones Company. Let me use a more recent example, Pfizer; In
2000 when the stock traded at $60 per share, few thought it would be trading
at $23 six years later. Look at the stocks that make up the Dow Jones
Average, these are mostly excellent
companies, who's stock prices, did nothing over the past 6 years. Market
downturns are bad if you have money in the market, both good and bad companies go down
when the markets decline. It's the investors with cash who are then able to
take advantage of cheap stocks. Timing is part of the game, get use to it.
6/6/06 I'm watching some of the companies that are being pushed by the
newscaster and it seems that the upside benefit doesn't justify the risk. Sorry, I just don't see many value,
or properly priced growth plays, at this stage of the
game. For instance,
United
Technologies (UTX
- $61) I don't care how good the CEO is, how much can you really make at 17
to 20 times earnings. The same for
Pepsi (PEP
- $60). When the target prices are10% or so higher then today's prices, you
are there, why take the added risk. Today we have increasing interest rates, high
oil prices, the beginning of inflation and large deficits. I guess if you
hold these companies forever you
could do well. The overall mindset, however, is wrong; I was watching CNBC
and one of the equity analyst mentioned that he hasn't seen values like this
in 15 year. If he believes that, then he belongs in the market; as for myself, I'm moving more
and more into cash. Good Luck - Joe P.S. Don't
misinterpret my point, anyone could buy "best of breed" companies. The trick
is to buy good quality stocks cheap. I rarely make money paying "fair
value", these companies need to come down in price 20 to 25% before they are
good buys.
6/2/06 Welcome everyone! I hope you had a chance to
look at my redesigned site. Over the past year I added content to make
the information flow better. Being one person, I also had to narrow the
focus. I just don't have the resources to be all things to all
investors. Now lets discuss stocks!
Putting aside my trading account, for my long term
portfolio, I noticed that over the past year I did two things: First, I
took some of the profits and paid down my bank debt. We are well into
the recovery; while stocks are up, it may be a good move to take money
off the table. Second, I've been slowly narrowing my diversification. As
I'm writing, I'm only in Oil Service, Defense, Medical and Cash. For
those who missed the run up in GPS technology, a buying opportunity may
be presenting itself. Start following
SIRF
Technology (SIRF
- $30.17). Be careful, the stock is heavily played by the day
traders, and it had a bad first quarter. I would start following the
company again. Additionally, be careful with your diversification
strategies, It's not prudent to be in the position I'm taking.
Good Luck - Joe
Q: 12/11/05 Hi Joe, Why does a company buying
back stock make the company more valuable?
A: The total value of a company does not increase when
management buys back shares; the individual shares, however, may
increase in value. Here's why:
-
When a company buys back its shares, they are
actually calling up a stock broker and purchasing shares on the open
market. This creates a steady demand for the company's stock,
prompting up the price.
-
The more popular concept is that, by
repurchasing its own shares, a company is reducing their shares
outstanding, all other things being held constant, the company EPS
would increase, thus increasing its share price. The total market
capitalization, however, should remain the same.
-
Management also hopes that as the company's EPS
grows, its price earnings ratio may also increase. This, however,
may or may not happen.
-
Every situation is different and you really
need to find out why a company is repurchasing its shares. Many
times, a company has issued so many stock options that it
repurchases shares to hide the negative effect that option dilution
will have on its stock price.
-
Another factor to look at is: Where is the
money coming from to pay for the shares? Is the cost of the shares
coming out of cash or is the company borrowing money to pay for the
repurchases. By understanding the flow of cash it may (or may not)
give you some insight as to what is driving the repurchase.
-
Giving money back to shareholders can also be
considered a negative. Of course, some companies like Microsoft,
have so much free cash flow that not returning the excess cash flow
to shareholders can be somewhat negligent. Many other companies,
however, return money to shareholders, in the form of buybacks,
because growth opportunities are not available.
-
Companies just don't give money back, there's
pressure put on them to do so. You need to find out where the
pressure is coming from.
It's not a slam dunk investment move. Don't equate
all stock repurchases with increase stock prices. Yes, it is a positive;
you need, however, to find out what is motivating the company to
repurchase shares to determine if it's a good stock move. Good Luck.
Joe
Q: 11/29/05 I am looking
for an international bank play and leaning towards India. I am looking
at hdb or ibn which would be the better choice?
A: I like India to; however, I would like you to take
a look at
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMFJY.PK - $9.5). The price is up
from a few years ago, but there's still a lot of value left to go. If
the Japanese recovery continues, Sumitomo should regain its world class
status. It's still turning around and they are working thru their bad
debts and loan to value real estate short falls. I like this Asia move
better, because you are picking up a potentially world class bank "on
the cheap". Good Luck - Joe Click here:
for my 8/27/04 comments on SMFG.
Q: 11/24/05
Sirf Technology
(SIRF
- $28.12) I was recently asked "Is there money to be made on SIRF".
A:
Let me start by mentioning that I own SIRF. For those who never heard of
SIRF it's a leader in the GPS semiconductor location technology. Zacks has
high earning estimates of .65 for the YE 12/05 and .90 for YE 12/06;
resulting in a estimated PE ratio of 31 times 2006 earnings. Revenues grow 56%, from the prior year, in the
September quarter and 23% on a YTD basis. Market Capitalization is $1.4b.
The Balance Sheet has $100m of cash and investments with little LT debt. Its
cash flow is being used to grow the balance sheet. I think it's a risky
play and am concerned that the insiders seem to be selling a lot of shares.
I ambivalent. I like the company's growth potential but it could turn out to
be just another small technology company with a lot of promise and a high
stock price that fizzles out. It's just to soon to tell. I
purchased SIRF for some very simplistic reasons; SIRF is still somewhat
under the radar screen, the growth prospects are excellent, by listening to the
investor conference calls, the management team sounds smart. Overall, I
believe this is a good
choice for an aggressive growth play; and Yes, I think you can make money on
SIRF.
Good Luck - Joe
10/6/05 I noticed that over the years whenever I buy a stock at the so
called "fair value" I lose money. Many times I just lose patience;
especially if I held the stock for a while and it's down a little. That's
why I always think it's better to pass then overpay. The Dow at 10,317
is not cheap. This is the time to be careful. Don't be overly confident.
Wait for the low price. Remember Cash is King and prices don't move that
fast. The last few nights I watch some TV stock talk shows and they made buy
and sell decisions in 2 seconds. I have done that many time, however, for me
to answer a simple stock question on this website it takes HOURS. I don't
think buying stocks when they are being pushed is the way to go. Yeah
traders make money on a 1% move but that's a full time job. Many people who
work can not dedicate the time to do that; and yet people buy the popular
stocks anyway. I don't think they understand the game. A few years ago
when I purchased Halliburton at $13 I was worried. Look, I realized a lot of investors made very good money in
oil. If a company like Halliburton made .73 per share for the quarter
annualized that at $2.92 grow it 30% for 2006 and value it at 30 times
earning and you have a $113 target price. I personally hope that happens,
however, normally, except for Valero, things just don't turn out that way. I
hope everyone thinks before they jump. Good Luck - Joe
9/5/05 Hello everyone! I hope you had a good summer and
my preys go out to the citizens of New Orleans.
As a short recap, it seems that stocks, oil prices, and housing costs are high and
interest rates are increasing. I'm extremely cautious! I think it's time to
pay down debt, while the market is on the high side, both your high cost
credit cards, as well as, your mortgage debt. We are well
into the recovery and high oil prices and increasing interest rates don't lend
themselves to higher stock prices.
My focus, this summer, has been on the oil service companies such as
Halliburton (HAL
$31.16) and
Nabors (NBR
-$33.56); defense contractors like
Raytheon (RTN
- 39.34); and specialty medical firms such as,
Biomet (BMET
- $37.34).
Oil service stocks, while high, are really not that expensive; for instance, Halliburton
is at the same price that it was at in 1997. Nabors is only a few points
above its 2001 high.
Input/Output (IO
-
8.19); is my small cap aggressive investment move. It's a low price,
technology based, seismic oil service company. IO is a somewhat risky
investment because of its choppy history. I'm betting that the oil situation is real and that the majors
and the smaller oil producers will increase their exploration budgets; which
eventually should filter down to Input/Output. I also think defense
electronics is going to stay somewhat strong and companies like Raytheon
should do well. As for Biomet, the fourth largest orthopedic manufacturer in
the country, it has excellent profit margins and EPS growth; selling at a
reasonable PE ratio. Biomet operates in a recession proof market and
business should only get stronger as the baby boomers age. Good
Luck - Joe
I'm in the process of writing another investment book. I'm trying to get the
bulk writing completed by December. The preliminary feedback is that its
very very good. As I progress I'll keep you informed. After the book is
completed I'm going to reinvent this website. The focus going forward will
be on investor education. - Joe
7/8/05 I was very sorry to hear about the blast in London. My prays are with
them.
For those investors who feel the markets may decline and are interested in
locking in their profits, options may be a good tool to protect the value of
your portfolio. Additionally, writing covered calls can also increase your
yield in a flat or declining market. - Joe
5/24/05 As I mentioned, I'm writing another investment book. It's
going to be an investment handbook for young adults. One of the topics I'm
addressing is zero coupon bonds. On page C3 of The Wall Street Journal there
is an article on how companies are misclassifying accrued interest on zeros
in their cash flow statements. I don't see it as a big issue, but the
companies, (including their outside auditors and bankers) should get their
bookkeeping right.
What is of interest is that a shift has occurred; many investors are now
focusing on a company's cash flow, as they should. Cash flow is becoming the
measurement (instead of earnings) on how to value a company. I notice with
myself, Cash Flow from Operating Activities, EBIT and EBITDA are some of of
the first figures I review when looking at a stock. If one is serious about
making money in the market, you need to focus on understanding a company's
cash flow. I routinely talk to a lot of investors and many have no
understanding of cash flow. I think it time for most investors to take their
game up a notch. - Joe
5/7/05
Rhodia SA (RHA
- $1.82) - The troubled $7b French global specialty chemical company.
Is Rhodia a cheap stock or a junk stock? Can it turn itself around? At
present I have no comment; however, at $1 per share it's time to do some
homework on the company. I just remember my days at National Distillers over
20 years ago, profits swung widely as the price of oil went up and down.
Good Luck - Joe
4/22/05 Now that the NYSE is being automated, I believe its time to come
clean on the issue of counterfeit shares. I'm concerned that the system
may be flooded with counterfeit shares of common stock adding a potential
valuation risk to securities that is not presently priced into their market
values. Individual company's issued shares
should be supported by stock certificates held individually or in street
name, secured, at financial institutions; and reconciled to individual statements. I
have never seen any attestations that all shares have been, secured,
accounted for and reconciled. The results may be scary but I would rather
know now if there's an issue then finding out in retirement. I think the SEC
and the brokerage firms should add this to their reporting requirements as
quickly as possible.- Joe
4/18/05 When I original wrote the text to my book I was going to leave
out
"The Spinella Heart Rate Theory" however, my editor
found it of interest and value, and suggested I leave it in. Below is a
recent Q&A example as to how the theory is applicable
to you:
Q:
4/18/05 What is your opinion of Research
in Motion? I knew that it was speculative when I bought it, but it seems
to be doing very well. It seems that anyone who has a substantial job
has a Blackberry!
A: I believe your observation on
Research in Motion (RIM.TO - $85.78) is correct. However, I don't
think trying to find the next Microsoft is the way to go
anymore. Buying Rim at 48 times earnings is expensive. Years ago my
father owned a few of the "Nifty Fifty" stocks; after the market broke
in 69, there was very little money to be made in most of those
companies for a long long time. Today, the echo-boomers are still buying
computer technology stocks, I believe, however, that the baby
boomers have moved on, into dividend paying value stocks. That said; the
pool of money flowing into technology stock may not be there to cash out
computer technology investors.
Additionally, I think stocks may move in a trading range for a long
time. That said; the true buy and hold investor may not make real money,
because their stocks will be trading in a range; they will get their dividends
and hopefully some price appreciation to offset inflation but not much
more. [Think of the market in the follow manor: stock prices
will go up and down like your heart rate, but eventually they return to
a resting rate. Of course their will be exceptions, but stocks price
movements may perform in a heart rate pattern for a prolong period,
similar to the picture above.]
Who then is going to make money? I believe the turnaround investors, as
well as those investors who are able to invest in a trading range are
going to do well. This is not day trading, its buying low and
holding until the company becomes in favor again, and then sell when the
stock hits a reasonable value. And then find another out of favor
stock. The cycle may take a few years. Selling and take
profits is part of the strategy and then be willing to sit on the side
lines until the next opportunity presents itself. - Good Luck - Joe
4/8/05 I'm concerned with the tightening of the consumer bankruptcy
laws. The arguments seem sincere, no one wants an abusive system, but when I
see companies like Morgan Stanley divesting their credit card holdings as
the M&A cycle is improving, I think why? Infighting is common in business
you don't divest a cash cow because of bickering. Maybe I've been
watching to many late night conspiracy theory movies. I believe, as the baby
boomers reach retirement (at some pushed back age) the economy may gradually
slow down. As immigration tightens and we become a more closed society; the
echo-boomers may be unable to pick up the slack. It seems that our economy
may imitate Japan's 1990's downward trend. That said; over the past decades
the US credit card companies were not prudent in issuing consumer loans and
setting
lending limits. I'm surprise that the law allows FDIC insured institutions
to willy-nilly issue credit cards. Is trouble on the horizon for our
financial institutions? Normal
credit losses are priced into the yield, however, a prolonged high level of
unusual losses on unsecured loans would become a major issue. Are the tightening of the consumer
bankruptcy laws a precursor for real trouble ahead? Do the real
insiders suspect what I suspect?
4/4/05
AIG (AIG
- $1,019 adjusted for a 20 to 1 reverse split in 8/09, at the time,
however, it sold for $50.95 ) AIG is a beautiful company. Issues aside, if you change its
managers, eliminate its incentive plans, and demoralize the organization;
What's left? A semi-cyclical company with little motivation to blow out
budgets or create new products or markets. That said, today (if facts remain
constant) I would value AIG based off a PE ratio of approximately 10 to 12
times, and would not consider purchasing shares unless they sells for less. In
today's market its hard to make money buying at fair value I would wait (and
hope) for a steal.
For those investors who are unfamiliar with AIG, while their numbers are in
a state of flux they have four significant sources of cash flow; general
insurance, life insurance, financial services and retirement services each
generating billions in operating income. They also have a very strong
foothold in the Asia markets. I suggest investors get to know AIG the
education may be worth it.- Good Luck - Joe
3/19/05 I just finished watching an investment news show on PBS. On the
whole the advice was excellent. However, when the host discussed index funds
he mentioned that an average return is ok. Investors are being sold that an
"Average" return is a good rate given that many money mangers can't beat the
averages. Aspiring to be average is wrong. A "C" is average. Did your
parents teach you to be average? Why are we so willing, to pay high fees, to accept mediocre
returns from our investments? Returns from professionally managed funds
should be an "A". Investment strategies have to be changed to
strive for better returns. A percentage or two will made huge difference in
the quality of your life.
3/17/05 GM's 14% stock price drop along with downward 2005 earnings
estimates should be a wake up call to investors. I was a kid, but I was
there, 32 years ago, when the 1973 oil embargo occurred. Back then the oil
and defense stocks climbed daily. The autos, chemicals and airlines
preformed poorly. Many technology stocks also collapsed! Remember the Nifty
Fifty. I don't recall what happened to the drug stocks, I assume they did
well. Today oil at $57 a barrel is getting scary. My only idea is to, don't
over pay, but, Follow The Money. Invest in those company that are; and can
continue to, produce profits in this environment. Stocks are high, I don't
see many contrarian plays. Good Luck - Joe
3/15/05 While my kids were in Karate this afternoon I read
the stock pages in the Journal, there's really not that many good buys
around. I think investors need to be extremely selective in their
choices. - Joe
3/10/05
Pearson (PSO
- $12.16) - Pearson is a global media company that has re-shuffled its
businesses over the past few years to focus on education, business
information and consumer publishing. The company's main properties are
Pearson Education, The Financial Times Group, and The Penguin Group. My
thinking is that; as the baby boomers age, more of their disposable income
will be used on reading materials where Pearson should benefit. On February
28, 2005 the company reported its YE 2004 results - $'s stated in pounds.
Sales of $3.9b, free cash flow of $288m, pretax income of $171m and net
income of approximately $109m. The company has a negative tangible net worth
of approximately $74m and LT debt of $1.7B. It seems that PSO's free cash
flow of $288m was mainly used to pay dividends of $201m. The company's ADR's
pay a 60 cents (US) dividend which translates into a 4.9% yield. The yield
is attractive, however, the company has a $9.8b US market capitalization,
selling at approximately 46 times unadjusted last years earnings (using an
exchange rate of 1.92479). I like the organization, however, even though its
stock price is off approximately 60% from its 2000 high of $30; I would still hold
off on purchases until a better price presents itself. - Good Luck - Joe
3/5/05
In responses to a comment on the message boards,
I did not recognized CRA's stock symbol at the time. However, I wrote
this comment a few weeks ago and it still
applies and hopefully it will be a value in your
investment strategizing.
Celera Genomics (CRA
- $11.12) - "The company has significant cash and
short term investments to cover expenditures for
the foreseeable future. It only has 73 million
shares outstanding. If it develops a "hit" it
has the potential to be a big win. This is a
good long term "Atlantic City" stock play. I
think it's to early to evaluate the potential of
the CRA's research pipeline. Celera has a high
beta and large losses, I don't see a rush to buy
the stock, as such; I would wait for a lower
price. Look, I like Applera! Try to buy low so the investment
really pays off." That said; you should be
able to make money at these prices. Additionally,
I believe CRA may one day see a $40 plus stock
price
again. Good Luck - Joe
3/1/05
Repsol YPE (REP
- $27.18) - Interested in a reasonably priced oil stock? Take a look at
Repsol! It's one of the largest intergraded oil companies in Europe
and is based out of Madrid and Buenos Aires. Repsol is only 3 points above
its 2000 high of $24 per share. It has a relatively strong balance sheet and
a reasonable PE ratio, selling at approximately 11 times earnings. Reserves
are an issue and the company acknowledges that it has a low organic
reserves replacement ratio. It seems that the company is spending its
exploration dollars on projects in Western Argentina. I recently added
Repsol to my portfolio because it's a moderately priced commodity play. -
Joe
2/24/05
Royal Group
Technologies (RYG
- $7.74) - This is a company in turmoil that now qualifies to be placed on a
Watch List for potential purchases. RYG is a mid-cap vertically integrated manufacturer of home
improvement and construction products. It had FYE 9/30/04 revenues of
C$1.9b. The company has
issues, for now just become familiar with the company and its risk /
reward equation.- Joe
2/15/05
Service Corp.
(SCI
- $7.37) - The largest funeral parlor & cemetery operator in North America. Five days ago
Service Corp initiated its first dividend, 10 cents annually, since
1999. SCI is generating significant free cash flow. Over the past four years the
company stream-lined its operation by selling foreign assets, paying down
debt and settling litigation. The company is now is well positioned and the
stock has significant upside potential. Value line has projected 2009 EPS
estimates at
$2.00. I just increased my position in the stock, I also believe that SCI is
a good fit for most portfolios. - Joe
2/14/05
Bombardier Inc. (BBD-SVB.TO - C $2.61) This is a nice, but risky,
pre-turnaround situation. For those investors who never heard of
Bombardier,
it is a Canadian Aerospace and Transportation company. Their results for the
nine months ending 10/31/04 were; revenues of $11b, net loss of $141m, and a YTD cash flow from operating activities of $18m (breakeven). Business was
split practically even between aerospace & transportation. They also have a
small inventory & lease finance subsidiary. The businesses are cyclical, the
company is leveraged, and has a negative tangible net worth of approximately
$139m. Bombardier also pays a 9 cents per share dividend. For $2.61 your
getting a well respected, well managed, global industrial organization that
should benefit from the ongoing world wide recovery.
1/21/05 I need some quick information from my readers.
First, I'm looking for a few public companies that are experiencing
explosive growth today or in the near future. Second, I'm looking
for public companies in the computer forensic field. (To respond, use the
e-mail set-up in the ask the author section). Thank you in advance! - Joe
1/10/05 My bookstore is finally up. Take a look at it, its
very cool; not that bad for an accountant! My book should be out in about a
month I'm trying to feature it on the site. Nothing new on stocks today. On
Sunday I was looking at some of the 2005 stock picks by the analysts in the
newspapers. I'm not mentioning names, my one thought was that the prices
were high and most investors won't make that much money on these picks. Be
careful, most of the low hanging fruit is taken. I believe going forward the
opportunities are going to be in contrarian / turnaround situations. The
game is to be able to separate out low price stocks from junk stocks. Its
going to take work and some degree of luck. It is a risky strategy but the
returns are good. Keep your eyes open for one. - Good Luck - Joe
1/6/05 As you may know, I'm working on developing a global
investing section on my website; as I'm going thru hundreds of ADR's I
noticed a lot of opportunities all over the place for many types of
investors. The risks are high and the information is limited, but for those
willing to do their home work I believe theirs good money to be made here. I
need at least another week to complete my first draft of the section. If
your interested
Click
Here to look at the construction site. Have Fun! - Joe
1/5/05 I just don't understand why the Fed is obsessed
with slowing down the economy. If Asia keeps on growing and we stand still
eventually we will become a secondary economic power. Growth is good, it
feeds on itself. It builds infrastructure, creates jobs, fixes the deficit.
People like to get raises, they feel good about themselves. I realize
inflation is bad on the seniors who live on fixed incomes, however, you grow
or you die. That said, I believe its time for a leadership change at the
Fed. - Joe
1/4/05 I think the tsunami in Asia is going to have a big emotional
effect on the United States and its spending patterns. My first thought when
I heard about the disaster and our response of donating $100,000 to four
countries was that we are broke as a country. Of course that is not true,
but money must be tight. Sometimes being broke is good, it teaches you
budgeting 101. Do we spend our money on humanitarian aid or buy another
F/A-22 fighter? That said, today's WSJ, page A3, mentions a proposal to cut
$18b, over six years, out of
Lockheed Martin's
(LMT
- $54.21) contracts. While this is only talk, the investment dynamics of LMT
may be changing. If the company loses $18b of contracts, its growth rate
will slow. You could find yourself owning a company growing in the low
single digits selling at 20 times earnings. Owning a great company with a
flat stock price is a poor use of ones money. I think, if your portfolio is
over weighted with LMT starting thinking about rebalancing your
position. Good Luck - Joe [6/8/06 - I'm still not sure I miss
read the facts. Sure LMT is up 30%, nonetheless, I still think our spending
habits may come back to haunt us.]
12/30/04 I need to apologize because I'm
falling behind on answering some questions. Please bear with me. I'm
working on an ADR analysis in my (Foreign Correspondents) section of this
website. Its very interesting, however, as I'm going thru the countries
looking at their ADR's I noticed that, for what ever reason, a lot of
foreign companies are no longer trading on our exchanges. Look, someone in
the government needs to: first see if my observations are true; and if true
take action. We as a country can not be an economic power if foreign
companies don't trade on our exchanges.
12/27/04 Today’s NY
Time's business section had an excellent article on page 6 titled Economic
View. The author cited various investment strategist who believe, as I do,
that the growth rate of profits for businesses is likely to be less in the
next 50 years than, over the past 50 years. The article mentioned that
returns could be as much as 1/3 less. That said, how do you invest going
forward? (I’m not going to pull out brokerage statements for exact figures,
but, the numbers should be close) I’m not a pure turnaround player; I’m all
over the place and participate in many types of strategies. I do believe,
however, that in an environment where equity is plentiful (like today) you
need to find value in places where equity is scarce and thus the potential
returns are greater. Many of the stocks I’ve been mentioning on this site
have commonality. They are $10b (revenues) turnaround companies; where the
equity players left. Go back and look at the name. Halliburton $12 per
share, AT&T wireless $3 and change, ICI $5-6 and change, El Paso $3? and
change per share, Sumitomo Bank $1 and change, Lucent $20.00. Turnarounds
situations are very risky; you don’t know where the bottom is. Take Lucent,
I thought $20 was the bottom and it went to 50 cents. You just don’t know.
I’ve been looking at
Calpine (CPN
- $3.78) & Tenet
(THC
- $10.71) for the longest time, looking for signs of a sure turnaround.
Something that says its time to buy! I’m still waiting for more data on
these companies. It’s
a difficult and risky process. (See 12/20/04 Q&A section on Calpine) You don’t want
a whole portfolio of turnaround companies because they could all turn out to
be junk. If you accept the premise that all you could earn is 4 to 6% on
your money use the index funds at Vanguard they are excellent. Turnaround
situations are for those investors looking for a significantly higher rate of
return than the market rate, but you need to be extremely careful. If the
readers know of any other big turnaround names please e-mail me, I'm always
in search of a good investment. Good Luck, Joe
12/24/04 I hope Santa is good to everyone
tomorrow. The big question is: What is our strategy on
Pfizer (PFE
-$26.07)? I think this is being play tight to the vest and the facts
may not all be out yet. I would watch the price on Monday, then use a
dollar cost average approach over the next year and build into your
position. If it goes up don't over pay. There's no rush, however, you need
to act if you want to participate in the game.
12/17/04 I was recently
asked, what stocks are you personally buying? Well, recently I did some
rebalancing of my portfolio. I reinvested some gains I had in energy stocks
and purchased
QLT (QLTI
- $15.50). QLTI is a small drug company located in Vancouver (I normally
stay away from Vancouver companies). QLT “is a drug company that makes
money, has a good pipeline, has cash, is growing, and is reasonably priced.”
Its main product is the anti-blindness drug Visudyne. This may interest
investors who have some Atlantic City money to invest. Postscript: QLT's
competitor
Eyetech Pharmaceuticals (EYET
- $45.50) received FDA approval for,
Macugen, a competing eye therapy. Macugen is sold by Pfizer while Visudyne is sold by Novartis.
12/10/04
Vimpel
Communications (VIP
- $29.35) - For those who never heard of Vimpel it’s the Bee Line cell phone
company operating from Moscow. It’s a well managed, and adequately financed,
midsize company; generating approximately $2b in annual revenues. FYE 2004
EPS estimates seem to range between $2.00 and $2.45. Here is a company with
a high growth rate, and low PE ratio, however, I still think it’s pricy. You
don’t need to be a PHD to figure out what is going on in Russia. Not that
long ago (a few years ago) there were articles explaining how the Russian
Army were not paying their soldiers. The government needs funds and is taking
it! That said; there is an enormous legal risk involve with Russian ADR’s
that is not priced into their securities. Be careful. - Good Luck, Joe
12/10/04
Pfizer (PFE
- $27.37) Pfizer is an excellent defensive play. I’m concerned that the
investment mood may change in 2005. There are a lot of signals suggesting
caution. Oil prices and unemployment figures are high; interest rates are
rising and the dollar is low. Zacks has 2005 EPS estimates for PFE at $2.43
resulting in a forwarding PE Ratio of 11. Here you have one of the best, and
strongest, growth companies in the world; growing earnings in the low teens
and selling at 11 times earning. It also is paying a 2.5% yield while you
wait for the investment climate to improve. So far it seems that Pfizer’s
Bextra and Celebrex will remain on the market. Additionally, drug stocks
perform well in recessions. I believe the risk reward ratio is very
attractive at this price and strategically, healthcare is a good sector to
be
in if the economy slows down. – Good Luck, Joe
12/3/04 For those stock investors interested
in buying gold, silver or platinum coins take a look at
www.bordergold.com. I
liked their upfront format of listing prices and references right on their
website, as well as their gold and silver market commentary. I don't know the firm well enough to personally recommend them;
however, I spoke to their contact representative, and feel they are very reputable and can be a valuable
resource for the readers of this
site. If you are interest in buying investment coins you should take a look at
their website. - Good Luck, Joe
11/25/04 I Wish Everyone a Happy Thanksgivings. I have one
investment observation for the contrarian investor. Yesterday the NYSE had
384 new highs and two new lows.
Pfizer (PFE)
was one of the new lows, ending the day at $26.79. The stock is down
approximately 47% from its 2000 high. The company also pays a 2.5% dividend.
I'm off today, this is just an observation.
11/23/04 I just looked at some of the
stock prices of the bigger oil service companies. Most of the articles think
these stocks can increase a few points each. I think the upside is a lot
more; don't be surprised to see increases in the 50% range next year.
11/22/04 The Sunday
money section of the New York Times had an excellent article on investing
titled “The Four-More-Years Portfolio: How to Narrow the Field.” The author
had a good clarity of investing strategies. Nothing really new, but it was
well written, organized and had good picks. The five areas discussed were:
Military and aerospace, Oil, Financial services,
Managed healthcare and Bibles. The article mentioned a few names;
however, there are a lot of good companies in these sectors. That said;
I believe the game is: selection, price, and timing. Everyone is
watching these groups; therefore, the key is not to over pay for any
security. Whatever price you set as a good and realistic entry point for a
stock, try to buy it for less or pass on it. Don’t over pay. – Good Luck,
Joe
11/19/04
Taser
International (TASR
- $26.42) - A follow-up to my 9/16/04 comments: This is a mess in the
making. The FDA needs to step in here fast. The body’s electrical system is
delicate; for example, if you have a heart attack today it may take ten
years before a life threatening arrhythmia occurs. This country has been
watching too much Star Trek. Police Officers are now “testing” the weapons
on themselves. What are they thinking? They are shooting kids with this
gun. This could be another asbestos type situation in the making. Investors
need to be careful.
11/10/04 Today’s WSJ
(Page C5) has a article on “Accounting Body Plans to Clarify Rules for
Booking New Tax Break” Over a decade ago I implemented FASB 96 when I was
Controller of Copelco Capital (now part of Citigroup). The issue back than
was very simple; deferred tax liabilities on the balance sheets of most old
companies, no longer had any correlation to the company's actual tax
liability; resulting in misleading financial statements. FASB 96 corrected
years of abuse. Many late nights were spent implementing FASB 96. The intent
was that future tax rate changes would run through the current years P&L, so
your deferred tax balances would always represent the company’s future tax
bill. Now tax rates dropped 3%, fine, less tax is always good. The entire
deferred tax balance needs to be re-priced with the new tax rates. In this
case the benefit should run through this years P&L. Some companies like GE
have huge numbers. This creates swings in a company’s P&L, but that reflects
the true economic picture of what occurred. GE’s stock price deserves to go
up; the company’s future free cash flow will increase. Now executives are
discussing ways to smooth future earnings by recognizing this benefit over
time. The accountants and lawyers seem to be stuck on the cook book approach
to rule making. If the goal is to have transparent financial statements,
then
having swings in earnings is ok. GAAP earnings, where possible, should
equate to economic earnings. If this creates market opportunities so be it.
11/9/04
Scientific-Atlanta (SFA
- $29.16) I just have an observation: I no longer own SFA, but I did for a
few decades. I consider it an excellent cyclical growth company.
Investors in this security need to find out what effect Microsoft's
Foundation software will have of SFA's set-top boxes. - Good Luck - Joe
Spinella
11/9/04
Merck (MRK
- $25.87) Wait! Its to soon to purchase. Remember tax selling is
around the corner. Read my 10/1/04 & 11/5/04 comments they still apply. I
can't imagine the boy and girls at Merck doing anything bad. Ultimately,
this is a nice company to have some capital in. The risk is high so
therefore the potential return also needs to be high. To have a balanced
risk / reward equation; the price must drop substantially. - Good Luck - Joe
Spinella
11/8/04
Univision Comm.
(UVN
- $28.90) is the latest casualty caused by missing earning estimates by a
penny or so. Potentially UVN is a beautiful company with the trends going in
its favor. The issue I have is that; it’s highly leveraged and has a
negative tangible net worth. Its entire market capitalization is Air. That
said; its cash flow and markets are strong and growing. I would put it on a
watch list in the event that it drops to 20 times earnings (.77 EPS times 20
PE Ratio) or $15.40 per share. Twenty times earnings is still expensive but
there would be enough upside potential for your investment to be worthwhile.
11/8/04
GlobalSantaFe
Corp (GSF
- $28.30) I was marketing my website on the message boards of GSF and
noticed the price at $28.30. It seems to me that a few points (or more) can
be made here if the price of oil stays on the high side.
11/5/04 Today’s Wall
Street Journal, (Section C-1 – Heard on the Street) mentions some of the
pressures that Merck is facing. I think Merck is an excellent company that
will ultimately prosper. I don’t think 20 employees calling a head hunter is
a big deal. Investors seem to be looking at the 5.6% yield, along with a
stock price that has not reached these levels since 1996, and think they are
getting a bargain. Investors don’t
seem to get it; forget Vioxx for a minute, Zocor comes off patent in 2006.
11/3/04 How do we play a Bush victory?
Stay with the basics: Oil (CVX); Oil Service
(HAL,
BHI); Defense (RTN,
LMT); Healthcare (WYE);
Media (DIS,
SBGI); Insurance (PRU,
MET); Banks (JPM,
BAC) Contracting Manufacturing (FLEX);
and the like.
11/2/04
Videsh Sanchar
Nigam (VSL
- $7.64) The Wall Street Journal announced that
Tyco (TYC
- $31.70) sold its global fiber-optic network for $130m to VSL. For a risk
taker who has Atlantic City money and is looking for international exposure;
Videsh may be an inexpensive way to diversify into India.
11/1/04 I would like to
wish the candidates good luck tomorrow. This election has taught me that as
the population ages, security and religion becomes more important. As such;
Socially Responsible Investing may play a greater role going forward than it
did in the past. I suggest everyone read up on the strategy (It’s discussed
in detail in the Education Library section of this website.) Additionally
this election has highlighted the fact that the country is divided. The
lines have been drawn. This website is neutral and somehow we need to figure
out how to profit by this disconnection. I would take a little money off the
table until its clear how the election plays out. Don’t forget to vote
tomorrow. - Joe
10/27/04 Hear is question from a reader:
What do you think of
Avid Technology
(AVID
- $50.51) Avid makes the film editing equipment for the post
production houses and film studios. All of the old film equipment has to be replaced to
handle the new digital format. In my opinion that should be a one-time
benefit (that should take a few years) and than the growth trends should
flatten out. That said; Avid is a few years into the upgrade cycle; the
stock is selling at approximately 24 time earnings. Your long term upside
may be limited. I don't believe the market is that big, somehow you need to
find out for sure. I would be careful here. - Joe
10/25/04 Today’s Wall
Street Journal (section - C1) has a very good article titled “Counting on
Rebounds Can Be Folly” The Article quotes a manager from the Clipper Fund,
his experiences seem similar to mine. It seems that he has gone through The
Mines of Moria; his fund may be a good investment.
The problem
with March & McLennan is that, all the professionals are discounting the
company’s future cash flows and determining its fair value. Assuming the
professionals factored in the risks correctly; if everything happens as
anticipated, one would get a nice return, but it won’t be a steal. A
negative emotional wave has not occurred yet. The company has had a heart
attack, but it is not in cardiac arrest. The time to buy (if you like the
investment) is when the company is in Ventricular Defibrillation.
10/24/04 Today’s New
York Times (page 8 – business section) under Market Week – Believe in Magic?
– There is an interesting Presidential Election Year Theory. According to
the article, "since 1900 there were 16 occasions in which the Dow rose in
the two months before the presidential election. The incumbent won 15 out of
the 16 occasions. There were 10 instances when the Dow fell, and the
challenger won 9 of those times. The Dow was 10,290.28 two months prior to
November 1, 2004. The Dow closed at 9,707.81 on Friday; suggesting that if
the market remains constant Senator Kerry would win." Don’t be
surprised, if in a few days another Theory is released showing that the
President would win.
10/23/04
Google (GOOG
- $172.43) Investors are bidding up Google based on the underwriters
adjusting their “Valuation Models.” In most cases a valuation model is only
an excel spreadsheet. Yes, the company had a good quarter, but the current
$47b market valuation seems high. Here is my algebraic formula that I used
to determine if the value of Google seems reasonable. G = (R + H + T + C +
A) or - expressed another way - Google = (Raytheon + Halliburton + Textron +
Cablevision + Applebee’s) This means that all these companies combined have
the same market capitalization as Google I have two additional comments: 1) Google is not
the only search engine. 2) It is my understanding that search engine
technology is not that difficult. I'm not suggesting that you can't make
money at these prices, just be careful.
10/22/04
Titan Corp. (TTN
- $15.35) This is a $2b company with a $5.5b backlog; its hard not to be
interested in Titan. Titan is a leading technology contractor for the
Department of Defense and Homeland Security. Allegations (prisoner abuse
sandal & security violations) aside, I think the risk reward equation is
out-of-balance. Titan has mediocre margins, pays no dividends, has a
negative tangible net worth, and a lot ($575m) of debt. The stock seems
fully valued. The appeal is that it would be a nice fit under the umbrella
of one the prime contractors, particularly, Lockheed Martin. The short term
strategy is usually to purchase stock in the smaller company that hopefully
would be acquired for a premium. In this situation, I believe, there is more
potential in
Lockheed Martin (LMT
-$53.49) then there is in Titan.
10/21/04 Today’s Wall
Street Journal article on
Marsh and
McLennan (MMC
- $25.21) “Down but Not Out: What Is Marsh Worth?” is excellent, but I think
the conclusions are wrong. I don’t think this is the time when “cool” people
make money on MMC. The stock may seems to be at fair value from a cash flow
stand point, but it only seems that way. Who buys at fair value? To make
money you need to buy at a discount from fair value. There is no “panic in
the streets” the stock has just adjusted to today’s best estimate of the
company’s future cash flow value, as more information develops that figure
will also change. The company’s cash flow is drying up, it has approximately
$4b of debt, and the bankers are knocking on the door. $25 is a lot of money
for this company. Competitors should be able to take MMC’s insurance
business easily. All one has to do is hire the sales force, and they could pick
up the entire insurance side of MMC for nothing. It’s that easy. I think the
real power is using MMC to go after the
AIG money.
Sometimes doing nothing is the best stock strategy.
10/20/04 The secondary
semiconductor stocks are interesting. Stock prices are low, attracting the
bottom fishers. The industry is cyclical and competition from China is here.
Inventories are slightly bloated, putting pressure on sales and margins. The
finances, however, of the individual companies seem to be in order. The
economy is improving, creating opportunities in the 2nd half of
2005. Here are some names for the patient adventurous investor:
Veritas (VRTS
– 20.24) – Storage management
Xilinx (XLNX
- $27.83) – Fast programmable circuits
Altera (ALTR
-$19.81) – Fast programmable circuits
Q Logic (QLGC
- $28.70) – Storage networking
Nvidia (NVDA
- $13.50) – Graphics
LSI Logic (LSI
-$4.38) – Complex high performance circuits
Atmel (ATML
- $3.08) – Commodity chips
10/18/04 Today, a Wall
Street Journal article compared the insurance organizations in NYC to the
Mafia. The Mafia were murderers and drug dealers; the insurance allegations
are just about money. There is a very big difference. This is the beginning
signs for contrarian investing opportunities. The goal is to profit by an
over reaction to the situation. Now is the time to develop a watch list or
wish list in case of an industry collapse. Initially focus your research on
the NYC insurers. I realize that the emphasis is on the brokers,
however, I would take an opposite approach and become familiar with a few of
the more established insurers like Met
Life (MET
- $34) and
Prudential (PRU
- $44). It’s homework time!
10/16/04
Aegon (AEG
- $10.71) All eyes seem to be on the NYC insurance situation. It’s a mess
and may get worse. Aegon may be good alternative. US investors may be more
familiar with its Transamerica subsidiary. On a per share basis, the company has a $15 bookvalue,
earns approximately $1.21, and pays a 21 cents (euro) dividend. The
company's operations are primarily situated in The Americas (52%), The
Netherlands (20%) and The United Kingdom (21%). In the short term, the
ongoing investigations in New York may put selling pressure on the entire
insurance sector.
10/14/04
Denny’s Corp
(DNYY.OB - $2.85) Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal had an interesting article
on the success of Denny’s back-to-basics strategy. I think the management of
Denny’s is moving the company forward nicely. The company is notorious for
its breakfast menu. It has 556 owned stores plus 1,063 franchise stores,
generating $959m in total annual sales. At best GAAP profits are breakeven.
The company is highly leveraged with $553m of debt; pro forma debt to
EBITDA is 4.7 to 1. Today, this is primarily a banker’s game, not an equity
play. The debt restructuring cost approximately $20 million in bank,
accounting and legal fees. Future free cash flow is going to be used to pay
down debt with modest capital expenditures. Denny’s real estate assets are
appraised at $248m, but all the assets are pledge to the bank group. Look at
the stock from a different angle; profits are breakeven, yet the company’s
market capitalization (debt & equity) is approximately $800m. If one likes
the restaurant business, compare Denny’s to
Applebee’s (APPB
- $24.97). Applebee's generates net income of $115m per year, has a market
capitalization (mostly equity) of approximately $2b, and has a growth rate
in the mid-teens. Applebee’s free cash flow belongs to the equity holders,
thus the stock price should benefit, versus, Denny’s free cash flow is first
earmarked to the bankers. Leverage investments can be very profitable, but
Denny’s stock has already made its move (up from 45 cents on 1/4/04). I
suggest investors wait until GAAP profits materialize, debt is pared down
and the turnaround is further along.
10/13/04
Thermo Electron
(TMO
- $ 27.33) At 18 times next year’s projected earnings Thermo Electron seems
properly valued. There are no bargains here; however, TMO is a nice company
to have a position in. The company streamlined its ownership structure and
now has a $1.3b Laboratory Instrument Division and a $.6b Measurement and
Control Unit, with little debt. Operating margins are in the 16% to 18%
range, earnings growth is in the high single digits, but it is a cyclical
business. I’m interested in TMO because, management is smart, and the
businesses are generating a health free cash flow. I believe the pieces are
in place for this stock to do well.
10/6/04
Chiron (CHIR
- $37.28) – Hold off on buying Chiron. The stock looks attractive because
the manufacturing issue seems contained within FYE 2004. The company also
has three sources of operating cash flow: Blood Testing, Vaccines and
Biopharmaceuticals which deemphasizes the situation. Additionally, with
$830m in cash as of June 30, 2004 the vaccine shut down in England won’t put
the company out-of-business. Yes, Chiron is a good company! Its earnings,
however, are mostly back ended; thus meaningful positive financial results
are a year away. The stock is down, but the company’s market capitalization
is still $7b. In a good year the company only makes (net income) about
$220m. I noticed UBS upgraded Chiron’s rating from “Reduce” to “Neutral” I
agree with UBS. In my book neutral is associated with dead / flat money for
awhile. I would hold off on purchases until a better price presents itself.
10/6/04 I
watched the Cheney / Edwards debate last night, both were excellent and good
luck to them. It seems evident that the defense contractors will benefit no
matter who wins. Don’t get caught up in the euphoria, wait for a price dip
before purchasing, and avoid the commercial plane side of the industry.
I also
believe if Halliburton settles its asbestos issue the stock may have another
nice run.
Edward’s
position on buying drugs from Canada (and from other foreign counties) is a
recognition of what is occurring in the United States. If you are one of
the 45 million people without insurance, and need recurring or multiple
prescriptions, you may have to purchase your medications from Canada;
prescription drugs are just not affordable any more without an insurance
plan. The ground has moved from under the feet of the drug companies, be
careful with these companies.
Updating
skills and staying current with new technology is not limited to the
unemployed or aging groups. The long term trends seem to favor the for
profit training companies. However, I would wait, for clarity on the various
government probes, before investing in this sector.
10/1/04 The Bush / Kerry
debate last night was interesting. Good luck to both candidates. I took note
of the democratic instability in Russia. It’s now apparent that it is not
just limited to
Yukos.
One by one the consumer
product companies are stumbling. After three years of a tight economy it is
now evident that many consumers are only spending on the necessities.
Merck & Co. (MRK
- $33.00) – From an investor’s prospective It looks really dark for the next
two to three years. We are talking big numbers, in terms of lost sales,
profits and cash flow. Vioxx generated approximately $2.5b of global sales
in 2003, and Zocor $5b in global sales (coming off patent in 2006). The
company still has a $75b market value; the remaining products and pipeline
may not justify its current price. The entire organization will be effected.
The company is not contemplating cutting the 4.6% dividend, however; I
believe the dividend is in jeopardy. Period-to-period financial comparisons
will be negative. Cost cutting and layoffs are coming. Product and class
action lawsuits are expected and normally, government inquiries follow. At
the current price I see a lot of risk and limited short term upside
potential.
9/30/04
Colgate-Palmolive
(CL
- $45.36) – The current earnings weakness seems to be an industry issue. I
believe it’s attributed to the retailers gaining size, preventing the
manufactures like Colgate from passing along cost increases to their
consumers in a timely fashion. Nonetheless, the company is a leader in a
stable and very attractive market, has an excellent global geographic mix,
strong cash flow, and seemingly reasonable market value. My issue with this
company is that as of December 31, 2003 it had a negative tangible net worth
of approximately $1B. It seems like the company bought out the old
shareholders leaving the new shareholders with nothing. I would have
expected a 200 year old company, with its stature, to have equity. This
stock has been flat for five years. Now it’s a pure cash flow play. In the
current market, at its current price, I’m not excited.
9/27/04
Fannie Mae
(FNM
- $66.85) – As of March 31, 2004 the company reported net comprehensive
losses on their balance sheet of $14.8B. These are primarily losses on
mortgage related derivative transactions for their core business. This
presentation (bypassing the P&L and charging losses directly to equity) may
be fine for the accountants; however, from an economic perspective, prior
year’s earnings were overstated. If additional capital is needed, I believe
it will ultimately be available. Keep Fannie Mae on a watch list, because
there may be an opportunity here. Halliburton situations can be profitable
if played correctly.
9/24/04
Fannie Mae (FNM
- $65.51) and
Freddie Mac (FRE
- $64.59) – In an increasing interest rate environment, I anticipate
mortgage originations to slow, resulting in a reduction of Present Value
Profit on the new business generated by these companies. This eventually
will affect GAAP earnings. These companies are also light on equity and may
require some sort of capital infusion. Declining earnings, equity that may
be required, combined with a loss of confidence in management and numbers,
is not a good situation for companies that rely on the debt markets. Without
an immediate commitment by the government to back their debt; potential
liquidity situations exist. I would sit on the sidelines until a
better entry point presents itself.
9/24/04
Unilever ADR’s
(UL
-$16.53) – At 11 times earnings Unilever is a good buy. Yes earnings are
going to be below walls street estimates, but so what. Let’s face it; this
is a slow growth business. The company pays a cash dividend of approximately
3.48% or $.58 per share. Its consumer brands have strong customer loyalty.
Normally, if a mother uses Hellman’s Mayonnaise or Lipton tea in her
household, so will her daughter when she starts a family. Unilever won’t
make you rich, but it should, in the long-term, protect your capital. The
company pays a steady and growing dividend, is a hedge against inflation,
and most likely will provide some juice in terms of stock appreciation.
9/18/04
Raytheon (RTN
- $36.88) - The turnaround continues! Defense electronics is a great
business to be in. A Kerry victory may also benefit this Massachusetts based
company.
Valero Energy
(VLO
- $18.02) - Refineries are a low margin cyclical downstream energy business.
Currently the margins are high; profits are at record levels, double from
last year. 2004 post-split Wall Street EPS estimates are in the vicinity of
$5.65 per share, with a PE ratio of 6 times. Valero seems to be a very good
short-term play. However, the long-term buy and hold investor should pass.
Fresenius Medical
Care (FMS
- $25.30) and
Renal Care Group (RCI
- $32.11) - Kidney Dialysis is a fast growing and lingering problem in the
United States. FMS and RCI trade at 13 and 16 times projected 2005 earnings,
respectively. These are two moderately priced healthcare companies with good
earnings prospects.
Genentech (DNA
– $51.80) - Forget this company! When comparing DNA’S original IPO returns
against Amgen, Genentech was a poor investment. Hoffman-LaRoche already
showed their colors. Roche took most of the money on the first go-a-round.
Genentech always had great drugs and innovation! Roche still owns 58% of
the company. Why would the outcome be any different this time?
9/16/04
Taser
International (TASR
- $21.55) –
Medtronic (MDT
- $49.62),
Guidant (GDT
- $63.54), and
St. Jude Medical (STJ
- $71.81) are making oodles of money on correcting electrical malfunctions
within the human body. The body's electrical system is delicate. The effect of stun-guns on recipients needs to be
determined by electrophysiologists or the FDA, not coroners or law
enforcement officials. EP studies can easily determine the lethalness of
these weapons. No one wants another Amadou Diallo situation. However, the live testing of these weapons on police officers is
foolhardy, because the long-term health effects are unknown and may have
serious consequences. Stun-guns appeal to the security concerns of the
world. The market potential is attractive. However, there are financial risks that
are being ignored by investors. First, the PE ratio is enormous. Second,
government deficits are large, budgets are stretched, resources may be
unavailable for immediate purchases of these guns. Third, there is
potential litigation resulting from the incorrect use of these guns causing
death. Fourth, a public backlash may occur against the lackadaisical and inhuman use
of these devises. However, in the short-term, momentum investors and day
traders may do well, but long-term value investors should be extremely cautious.
9/13/04
Career Education (CECO -
$34.43);
Corinthian Colleges (COCO
– 13.65); ITT
Educational Services (ESI
– 35.94): School has now started. Students and families have liquated
assets and taken on debt to pay tuition bills. Investors are experiencing,
first hand, the raising cost of tuition and are now noticing that the
for-profit colleges and training centers are generating significant sales,
profits and growth. Igniting the excitement are stock prices that are
off 50% from their highs from just a few months ago. These companies now
have reasonable P/E ratios. Additionally, there may be a strengthening of
revenues from possible draft deferral programs, expected after the elections
in November. That said; is their an investment opportunity here? Yes! But
not today! Some of these companies are being investigated by the government
for abuses in student-aid, student-loan or accounting practices. There have
been management changes. The companies also have significant off-balance
sheet debt (operating leases) that is often overlooked in research reports,
causing misleading debt to equity analysis. I would hold off on purchases,
in the industry, until the government probes are quantified.
9/3/04
Lucent (LU
- $3.11) - The Company’s recent announcement of a potential $816M tax refund
is a nice financial boost. This gives Lucent the strength and flexibility to
regain market share from
Nortel (NT
- $3.83). Lucent needs to convey the urgency of the situation to the IRS and
grab Nortel’s customers while Nortel is firing employees, and mired in an
accounting sandal. It is now a down a dirty street fight for customers.
Place your bets! - See additional comments on 7/27/04.
9/2/04
Bristol-Myers
Squibb (BMY
- $23.51) – The current thinking on BMY is simple. One can receive a 4.7%
cash yield ($1.12 per share dividend), while waiting for the company to
turnaround. If all goes well, another 10 to 25 points may be possible from
the stock’s appreciation potential. For investors unfamiliar with BMY, they
are a global ($20B) pharmaceutical house, specializing in: cardiovascular,
cancer, consumer and baby healthcare products. Management has been busy over
the past few years; they purchased DuPont Pharmaceuticals, invested in
Imclone, sold Clairol and spun off Zimmer. The company seems to be well
capitalized; their 12/31/03 tangible net worth was $3.1B. BMY has net long
term debt of $3.1B as of 12/31/04; included in the net debt figure is $2.5B of debt due in 2006.
The projected debt payment is
easily covered by their $5.4B cash and marketable securities on hand at year
end. Cash flow, however, is tight. $2.8B in annual sales from Pravachol
comes off patent in 2006. Erbitux, Imclone’s colon cancer drug should help, but future dividend coverage may become an issue. For now, I feel the
dividend is safe. However, I’m leery of Value Line’s projections dated
7/23/04. The current price is appealing; however, the stock is not for the
risk adverse investor.
8/27/04
Sumitomo
(SMFJY.PK - $5.65) –
SMBC is for the adventurous investor. It’s the third
largest lending institution in Japan. The bet is that the Japanese recovery
will continue, increasing property values, thus reducing the collateral
shortfall (“air”) in the company’s problem loan portfolio. Real estate
values in Japan have been declining for the past ten years, resulting in
loan to value collateral distortions. The company is
already highly leveraged;
if it merges with UFJ its finances will be further strained. However,
the risk / reward trade-off is very appealing. The journey from a troubled
bank (on the verge of bankruptcy a few years ago), to a world class
investment grade institution is within reach. It’s the equivalent to
purchasing stock in an American Money Center Bank in the early 1990’s. I
believe SMBC is an attractive long-term stock, whether or not the merge
succeeds.
8/24/04
El Paso (EP
- $7.92) – Focus on the company’s cash flow; an estimated $1.8b operating
cash flow can cure a lot of problems. The company has an appealing
combination of gas exploration, production and transportation properties. Long-term debt,
projected at $15b - $18b is scary, but manageable. The
uncertainties surrounding security litigation, government fines, and
production may limit the short-term upside potential. Don't count on the old
21 cents quarterly dividend being restored any time soon. However, the
long-term business fundamentals are excellent, as such; this is a good
choice for most speculative energy portfolios.
8/18/04
CP Ships LTD
(TEU
- $11.53) - Investors first need to realize that the accounting issues faced
by the company may not be a financial blunder. This is how business
operates. When a company implements major new computer systems there are
issues. That said, Is there money to be made here? Let’s look for the
answer to that question from a different angle. CP Ships is a global
container shipping company, generating approximately $3.5 billion in annual
revenues. Long-term debt to EBITDA is manageable at approximately 2.5 times.
The company has a market cap of $1b, bookvalue of $1.3b and a tangible net
worth of $687 million. Forget EPS, the company's valuation seems reasonable. However,
presently there are extra risks associated with TEU. There are possible government
inquires into what happened, class action law suits, high oil prices, rising
interest rates, and a
slowing down of the global recovery. The risks seem to outweigh the benefits
of possible container rate hikes. There is also the cost and fear of terrorism that
may not be fully factored into the stock price. Treat CP Ships the same as
Commerce Bank. I would hold off on purchases to see if more news is
forthcoming and if the company’s valuation substantially declines. I like
the company and think the current price is reasonable. However, I would wait
and hope for a steal! Good Luck - Joe
8/9/04 – Here is a
comment to our website from another investor: “Stay away from
telecommunication stocks and buy
Service Corp
(“SRV”), because people always pass away.” I can’t beat his logic on
the longevity of men, and I also think Service Corporation has a good
future. Regarding telecom stocks, I also feel that one needs to be very
selective if participating in this sector.
8/5/04 - Here is an idea
from a reader:
Hello Joe, what are your
thoughts on
International Game Technology
(“IGT”)? Here is my thinking on the company: I believe that the current
conflicts our country has been involved in will drag the nation's economy
for years to come. Therefore, handouts from the federal government to
states will be little to none. One of the fastest ways for states to
increase revenue is to allow gambling and IGT is the best in providing slot
machines to the states. IGT views consumer addiction as a science and they
aim to prosper from it. I may not agree with what they are doing but I do
believe it will make money. Let me know what you think. - Gregory
Hi Greg, the analysts
also seem to like IGT and think $31 is a good entry point. I like the
company, but feel that you may not make money on the stock at the current
price. Right now the stock is selling about 23 times projected 2004 earning.
There is an article from
The Street.com, mentioning that IGT is projecting
15% annual earnings growth over the next few years. (Actual machine sales
are projected to drop from an estimate 90,000 in 2004 to approximately
75,000 to 80,000 in 2005). You could have a stock with growing earnings and
a declining PE ratio. In effect, IGT could be flat for the next few years.
That said, the stock looks appealing to investors because it has had a nice
5 year run, it’s a very well managed organization that is still growing
earnings, selling at a 35% drop from a few months ago. It is also a favorite
of Wall Street. However, I would pass on it, because machines shipped are
expected to drop next year, combined with a slowing earnings growth rate.
Good luck - Joe
8/3/04 – Commerce Bancorp (CBH - $24) - I live in New Jersey and I like the
company, but not at the current price. Now for the “Time and Temperature” on
Commerce Bank; one should read the August 2nd Barrons article,
the August 1st NY Times article and the May 28th Value
Line Report. I’m giving credence to Ernst & Young’s 2/16/04 Audit. After the
World Com fiasco, capitalization of expenses is probably one of the most
reviewed items in an audit. Regarding the comments by its competitors, if
they really saw something wrong, they would have reported the company
immediately, and not waited until Commerce took the market from them. I
would value Commerce as a multiple of bookvalue not earnings. Given the
uncertainty surrounding the company’s employees, class action law suits, the
industry (with raising interest rates), and the economy; I would hold off on
purchases to see if more news is forthcoming and if the company’s valuation
substantially declines.
7/27/04 - This website
will officially open on Thursday, September 9, 2004. Feel free to look around
during the construction process. I recommend you review the educational
library section; it is full of investment ideas.
I suggest investors
review the Oil Service sector. Normally, demand for oil is low in August and
picks up by February. Additionally, barring a double dip recession, the
global demand for oil should continue to pick up as the worldwide recovery
continues.
I like, and own,
Halliburton (Hal – $15): It
is down 52% from its 1997 high of $31. The company’s asbestos issue is close
to being settled. The Barracuda-Caratinga vessel project, by now, should be
properly reserved. Also, the company has substantial ongoing government work
in Iraq. I think the outcome of the November election will have more of an
emotional effect, rather than a financial effect on Halliburton. Lower
revenues and higher profits are projected. The company’s businesses are
strong going into 2005 and its stock price is reasonable.
For those who play the
quantity game, Lucent
(LU -
$3) is interesting. It announced a $5b contract with Verizon wireless. It
has had four positive quarters. In the most recent June quarter; it earned
$387 or 8 cents per share, and projected single digit growth going forward.
That translates into an approximate 9 times (running rate) projected PE
ratio.
Inflation is here, just
look at the price of oil, lumber, and metal. Be careful with the bank stocks
as interest rates raise. No one is 100% hedged.
The semiconductor
companies are also under selling pressure. The analysts expect a 2005 supply
glut originating from China. Some of the stock prices are starting to look
appealing, I would hold off on purchases until more bad news is released.
Read my Investment
Strategy section on IPO’s. I generally don’t view IPO’s as a good
investment. I think this holds true for the upcoming IPO of Google.
Boston Scientific (BSX - $37)
– It seems that investors are looking for a quick 15 points. If I were a
cath lab cardiologist I would be afraid to use their product, and if I were
the patient I would specifically ask for Johnson and Johnson’s stent. An
open chest emergency heart operation is extremely serious. It is major
surgery where patients do die, and /or have major complications, like a
stroke. This risk factor should be avoided where possible. That said; forget
the numbers and projections wait for both FDA guidance, as well as evidence
of customer acceptance of the Taxus stent before making stock purchases.
Good luck, see you in
September! – Joe Spinella
|